King Kong

By Antonette 2021-12-09 08:01:20

King Kong

I still don’t know how many special effects were made by the film crew at that time. It was indeed a visual feast to be able to watch such a film in 1933. The American market economy system regarded movies as commodities, but it was not a taste. Not advisable, because countless Hollywood filmmakers can think of ways to make commercial films bigger and stronger to satisfy the curiosity of the audience because they regard movies as commodities. Such an atmosphere is undoubtedly conducive to the...

By Imelda 2021-12-09 08:01:20

Cultural Context &Subtext Narrative

Please poke the original address: http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_764ecb420100q5wi.html

"World of Science Fiction" 2006 03 Issue Classic Sci-Fi Interpretation (10): The white shadow of the black "King Kong"

plus some notes of my own. Please ignore the paragraphs in "()".



The 1933 horror/disaster film "King Kong" caused a sensation in the world. It was not only a milestone in film history, but was listed as one of the 50 greatest films by the American Film...

By Lola 2021-12-09 08:01:20

You said that the 1.0 pen core is inserted into the 0.5 hole, is it okay?

The 1933 version of "King Kong" is surprisingly good to look at. Although in the movie "The Law of Cider House" I have seen the children's enthusiasm for watching "King Kong" every day before going to bed, I still did not expect a monster nearly 80 years ago. The film can be so exciting.

    Of course, the special effects of the movie at that time looked as childish as a child’s toy, but the extraordinary imagination and complete entertainment elements were impeccable, so that when...

By Rupert 2021-12-09 08:01:20

A decent film

Well-deserved movies. King Kong has been remade countless times. It can be traced back to 1933. I remember that it was introduced in a episode of the Central 6 program. It was said that horror movies became more popular when the economy was depressed. Is this a horror movie? Maybe it was that era.
     It's not as good as the King Kong shot in 2005. Although the special effects model is much better, the thickness of the plot is much worse.
     There are always incompatible primitive...

By Jackie 2021-12-09 08:01:20

Discrimination and fear

That era was considered okay, so it was smooth, but if we look at this movie from our current perspective. Still feel very rough.

I'm not just talking about special effects, but the kind of white supremacy in Hollywood in the 1930s. Natives were set to be ignorant and fearful of giants, while "heroic" whites formed a team to fight against the "cruel". Giant gorilla. This also more or less highlighted the ideology of the mainstream society in the West at that time.

Finally, the...

By Eloisa 2022-03-28 09:01:03

7.7 The 1933 version, for the time, the visuals were amazing, and the sound was pretty good. The heroine of this version is very...

By Isidro 2022-03-28 09:01:03

The sound effect design is of historical significance. In other aspects, the plot is neat and neat. Several scenes are well designed, and it does not seem to be completely outdated...

By Alexanne 2022-03-27 09:01:06

Buying a disk is not as clear as downloading it. The film is good, the imagination is...

By Gregory 2022-03-27 09:01:06

The stop-motion animation technology in the 1930s was really amazing. Later, Peter Jackson's version can be said to be a very faithful remake of this film, from the big story line to some subtle little...

By Justen 2022-03-27 09:01:06

Beauty killed the...