Budget
$15,000,000 (estimated)
Gross US & Canada
$25,442,958
Opening weekend US & Canada
$237,264
Gross worldwide
$36,869,414
Movie reviews
( 108 )
Add reviews
By Allison 2022-04-24 07:01:02
Blade Runner 2.0--A Turing Test
This is a movie about the Turing Test.
First, let's talk about what the Turing test is.
If a person asks a question, he cannot tell whether the person in front of him is a human or a machine. Well this machine has the same emotion and intelligence as a human and it passed the test.
In "Blade Runner" there is such a paragraph:
Dirk specifically hunts down the escaped robots and destroys them. Asked to distinguish between humans and machines, he would perform the...
By Emelie 2022-04-24 07:01:02
Machina, the rise of artificial intelligence
Gary, a young white-collar worker, was lucky enough to win the lottery and was invited to spend a vacation with the founder of the company. In the isolated mansion, Gary finally met the legendary big boss, the mysterious billionaire Nathan, and then he discovered The real purpose of the boss's invitation to himself is to perform the "Turing Test" on Ava, the robot made by Nathan. The "Turing...
By Colt 2022-04-24 07:01:02
From the big picture, this is a good movie. The intention is clear, mainly to express the consequences of the infinite development of artificial intelligence by human beings. As said in the movie, it is the same as the first person who made the atomic bomb.
But there are a lot of awkward flaws in this movie, perhaps to make it easier to cooperate with the development of the plot, the access control uses swiping cards (even the place where I go to work is swiping my face). Poor security...
By Edwin 2022-04-24 07:01:02
When watching the film, I subconsciously analyze it from an astrology perspective, and I can clearly see the traces of artificial intelligence imitating, and the unreasonable logic of the film itself: Where does the fear of destruction by artificial intelligence come from? According to the logic of the big data sampling in the film, this is still an imitation of the reflex behavior of life motivation, rather than its own vitality. It would be absurd to use painting to prove that AI is creative...
By Belle 2022-04-23 07:01:10
It's a complete psychological and emotional test
In the play, nathan began to write artificial intelligence at the age of 13, and his lifelong dream was to create an artificial intelligence that was the same as human beings.
Why so many comments are talking about self-awareness, this is far from need to prove, the older versions of Machina are struggling to get out, until they collapse and destroy themselves.
Nathan's entire test is testing eva's ability to love or affect, or realize that artificial intelligence, which only has...
User comments
( 91 )
Add comments
By Amelia 2023-09-25 11:37:38
Creepy and shuddering, using the "evil" of human nature to force out the "evil" of artificial intelligence, suddenly some understandings are born...
By Alex 2023-09-23 22:18:00
There is nothing too fresh from concept to...
By Vance 2023-09-12 09:04:02
"The Beauty of Machina", also known as "The world is so big, I want to see...
By Adelbert 2023-09-01 19:47:30
How can it be possible that AI should be human-like and AI should follow the three principles of robots. Have you ever seen a living person follow the three principles of...
By Cesar 2023-07-11 11:00:33
The story of artificial intelligence in a closed space is simple but not boring, old-fashioned but dramatic, and the actors have a wonderful ending. Don't trust anyone including...
Caleb: It's obvious, once I stop to think.
Nathan: [points to painting] You know this guy, right?
Caleb: Jackson Pollock.
Nathan: Jackson Pollock. That's right. The drip painter. Okay. He let his mind go blank, and his hand go where it wanted. Not deliberate, not random. Some place in between. They called it automatic art. Let's make this like Star Trek, okay? Engage intellect.
Caleb: Excuse me?
Nathan: I'm Kirk. Your head's the warp drive. Engage intellect. What if Pollock had reversed the challenge. What if instead of making art without thinking, he said, "You know what? I can't paint anything, unless I know exactly why I'm doing it." What would have happened?
Caleb: He never would have made a single mark.
Nathan: Yes! You see, there's my guy, there's my buddy, who thinks before he opens his mouth. He never would have made a single mark.
Nathan: The challenge is not to act automatically. It's to find an action that is not automatic. From painting, to breathing, to talking, to fucking. To falling in love...
Nathan: And for the record, Ava's not pretending to like you. And her flirting isn't an algorithm to fake you out. You're the first man she's met that isn't me. And I'm like her dad, right? Can you blame her for getting a crush on you?
Nathan: It's funny. You know. No matter how rich you get, shit goes wrong. You can't insulate yourself from it. I used to think it was death and taxes you couldn't avoid, but it's actually death and shit.
