Budget
$31,000,000 (estimated)
Gross US & Canada
$9,493,259
Opening weekend US & Canada
$84,669
Gross worldwide
$9,493,259
Budget
$31,000,000 (estimated)
Gross US & Canada
$9,493,259
Opening weekend US & Canada
$84,669
Gross worldwide
$9,493,259
Movie reviews
( 39 )
Add reviews
By Lawrence 2022-03-25 09:01:10
Most of Chaplin's works were completed before the age of 30, talent has nothing to do with age, and the world now does not lack the way you enrich yourself. This kind of vivid film color, compared to the current film, the simplicity seems pure , what he wants to say is blunt, everyone can understand, for his life, everything he does has his own reasons, his mother, his first love, and his neurotic questions, just like he said Don't ask, we all know what he wants to tell us is in his movies....
By Joelle 2022-03-25 09:01:10
The first time I saw Chaplin's movie was when I was a freshman. I watched his "The Gold Rush" and was attracted by the famous bread dance in it. Excited after watching it. Most of the movies of the original silent film era have been forgotten by us, and I finally understood why Chaplin was not abandoned by the era. His screen presence has always been remembered, and his work has endured for a long time. There are funny movements and interesting plot points in his films. The little characters...
By Zena 2022-03-25 09:01:10
Written on August 10, 2012
Maybe everyone is familiar with his silhouettes, props, and walking postures, but how many people have really stared at his face, this is the first time for me, through this film, to seriously look at his facial features, his His expression, his "unfamiliar" face, was somewhat incomprehensible and incomprehensible.
He lost his father in childhood, his mother was forced into a lunatic asylum by life, and his brothers were separated....
By Rebeka 2022-03-25 09:01:10
1992 Chaplin - Charlie Chaplin
1992 Chaplin - Charlie Chaplin
UK - 18 December 1992
Hong Kong - 12 March 1993
Charlie Chaplin...reminds me of my childhood.
We didn't even have the silent films of the 1920s and 1930s. We
watched all of them From the clips interspersed on TV, of course I felt old-fashioned when I was a child.
About two years ago, my interest came, and I looked for it.
I found several sets on youtube..
Modern Times Modern Times..City Lights - City Lights.. T
By Jamey 2022-03-25 09:01:10
[Film Review] Chaplin (1992) 6.9/10
Sir.Richard Attenborough's cradle-to-grave, rags-to-riches biopic of Charlie Chaplin (1889-1977) is anything but a hagiography, and should be more appositely re-titled as CHAPLIN AND HIS WOMEN, since the meat of this lofty work sees Charlie (Downey Jr.) gyrating from one wife to another (four in toto plus other conquests), meanwhile the more intriguing facet of his cinematic creative process is...
User comments
( 101 )
Add comments
By Edgardo 2022-10-02 21:46:03
The story is a bit of a go-to story, and from a biopic perspective, the movie is nothing more than piecing together several stages in Chaplin's life. But the film still looks quite interesting, and if you are obsessed with all kinds of gossip in the golden age, there is still a lot of information in this film. I like the director's use of the silent film comedy shooting technique into one of the paragraphs, which is also innovative. Robert Downey Jr.'s acting is amazing, and you can also see...
By Meredith 2022-04-24 07:01:14
The biography of the film is flat and nothing special. Robert Tang, you were not very high at that...
By Emie 2022-04-24 07:01:14
The title of Chaplin and His Lover is indeed appropriate. Downey Jr. looks like a hard worker, but the old age clothes are indeed worse. The tribute to the silent film is quite creative, and the most moving thing is to finally return to the United States to look at the real body on the screen, a timeless classic at the...
By Joanie 2022-04-24 07:01:14
There is always tragedy behind a comedian/director. The United States is also very good at hacking a person who always loves to throw off the big hat of community... at the end of the day, you won't be judged by what you didn't do but by what you did. He just cheered people...
By Oma 2022-04-24 07:01:14
Three-and-a-half stars, although it is unavoidable to have a running account, but there are still moving points. At the beginning of the composition, the door frame of the back is used to quietly examine Chaplin's life and intentionally portray him as a frustrated person who is constantly being hit. Behind the honor of the film master, Chaplin was subject to official pressure, public criticism, and moral scrutiny. At the end, he won the Oscar Lifetime Achievement Award, and the comedies of the...
J. Edgar Hoover: I sometimes wonder if you people realize the responsibility you carry. To my way of thinking, motion pictures are potentially the most influential form of communication ever invented. And there's no control over them. Your message reaches everyone, everywhere.
Mary Pickford: Message?
J. Edgar Hoover: Of course. Mr. Chaplin here reaches millions who only have to see. And when they see a mockery being made of our immigration services, I'd call that a message.
Charlie Chaplin: Yes, well, as you've already said, Mr. Hoover, motion pictures are for the people. Most of the people work for a living, and they don't make much money doing it. It gives them pleasure to see officialdom and the upper classes getting a kick up the backside. Always has, and it always will. And if that can change things, so much the better.
[to Mary Pickford, in a better pronounced, less cockney voice]
Charlie Chaplin: Bet-ter.
Mary Pickford: He's improving.
Charlie Chaplin: [leaving a screening of one of his movies during the Depression, Chaplin and his wife are surrounded by homeless people. They ask for his autograph and he obliges them. As they leave, he sighes] I wish they'd asked me for my money.
George Hayden: My Charlie, you weren't even thirty. You was the most famous man in the world, with your own studio, named after you. Couldn't you just enjoy it?
Charlie Chaplin: I can now, but couldn't then. It meant too much.