Budget
$5,000,000 (estimated)
Gross worldwide
$402
Budget
$5,000,000 (estimated)
Gross worldwide
$402
Movie reviews
( 1 )
Add reviews
By Edyth 2022-10-16 10:32:31
Wed Nov 10,
2004Conspiracy theory fans
sometimes feel that they are a conspiracy theory fan, and any strangeness will make them alert. Although there is a conscious adjustment to let oneself relax, the original vigilance from below the cerebral cortex still arrives as expected.
In the midst of these oddities I always come up with outlandish reasons, although most of them have proven to be normal: forgot to pay on the phone, went out to eat, and so on.
The underlying...
User comments
( 32 )
Add comments
By Alivia 2023-09-20 08:28:29
In that era when resources for translations were scarce, one of the movies that was played on a loop by cctv6 was politically correct at that...
By Jarvis 2023-09-18 14:05:56
I like this kind of conspiracy theory movie, but the suspense is revealed too early, and the good subject matter is...
By Hank 2023-09-08 04:44:57
Revisiting this old movie and gaining a deeper understanding. Stories are fictitious and phenomena are well-documented. From the book "Space Dwellers" can be confirmed. Behind the exuberant and manic burning of money, there are ugly politics and dirty transactions. Whether it is to attract people's attention or commercial production, the courage of filmmakers to expose the abuses is still...
By Kacie 2023-08-20 13:35:37
I saw it when I was a...
By Adolf 2023-08-16 22:53:36
==1==BDRip-NowYS is very beautiful, the lines are exquisite and simple, and survival in the wilderness is also praised, but the reasoning and investigation of the newspaper reporters are a bit boring and far-fetched. ....
Walter Loughlin: Listen to me and listen good. I don't like you, Caulfield. You're ambitious. You think the way to get ahead is to come up with the scoop of the century. Woodward and Bernstein were good reporters, that's how they did it. Not by telling me they've located Patty Hearst three times like you did or that brilliant piece of investigative journalism you pulled off by finding an eye witness to the second gunman in the Kennedy assassination. The small fact that the man had been in a mental institution at the time never deterred you, not 'scoop' Caulfield. Now most reporters are like me. They are plodders. They spend a lot of their time checking little things... like *facts*. They cover mundane stories like wars and trials and hearings. You never seem to have enough time in your busy schedule to stoop so low as to cover a story. You occupy your time with tips from people who never existed. Driving your car into water and claiming it wasn't your fault. Getting shot at by unseen gunmen. Now I really hate to interrupt your meteoric career with something so plebeian as a legitimate story. However, a train load of propane gas had the bad taste to derail near Galveston and there's a whole town that just might blow up. So it would be just really peachy of you if you would join your film crew that's waiting for you on the plane at this very moment while we speak.
Robert Caulfield: That was some speech.
Walter Loughlin: I thought so.
Robert Caulfield: Look, when a reporter tells his assignment editor that he thinks he may be on to something that could be really big, the assignment editor is supposed to say: "You've got forty eight hours, kids, and you better come up with something good or it's going to be your neck!" That's what he's supposed to say, I saw it in a movie.
Walter Loughlin: You're not crazy, I'm crazy. I'm crazy for listening and I'm crazy for saying what I'm about to say. I'll give you twenty four hours to come up with something. Not forty eight. I saw the movie too, it was twenty four.