Budget
$52,000,000 (estimated)
Gross US & Canada
$173,837,933
Opening weekend US & Canada
$25,353,380
Gross worldwide
$355,237,933
Budget
$52,000,000 (estimated)
Gross US & Canada
$173,837,933
Opening weekend US & Canada
$25,353,380
Gross worldwide
$355,237,933
Movie reviews
( 33 )
Add reviews
By Hoyt 2022-03-21 09:01:15
I have seen a lot of similar space rescue feelings, that is, how people can save themselves.
The explosion of the oxygen tank led to the crisis. In order to solve the problem of oxygen, the lunar module was switched; in order to solve the problem of carbon dioxide poisoning, a carbon dioxide filter was made. In order to solve the power problem, all the electrical appliances were turned off, no lighting, no heating, and the steps of the operation were simulated in a NASA simulator to...
By Thurman 2022-03-21 09:01:15
23 years later, it still looks good
I decided to watch this film after watching the Russian film Space Rescue which was released in 2017, which was completely unexpected. Released in 1995, 23 years later, it doesn't feel very low. I think there are two reasons for this perception: one is that it is adapted from history, so there is a background for the story; the other is that the film does not show many high-tech shots, and it is more important to put history and the great efforts of astronauts fully expressed.
Ordinary...
By Guadalupe 2022-03-21 09:01:15
Dreams are always unknowingly tied to the soul of human beings, but how many people can realize their lifelong pursuits? The result is nothing but a reward for the pursuit, and the pursuit is what truly makes the human soul shine. Even if it can only reach the edge of the dream in the end, it can definitely be called a great achievement. We should cheer for those who pass their dreams, and we should celebrate those great failures. Because it not only makes our souls radiant, but also...
By Lorine 2022-03-21 09:01:15
I've watched it many times over the years. The first time I bought a D-version DVD, I've lost my DVD player. I also gradually got to know many old actors in it, and they are very kind.
I don't agree with some of the comments that the first half of the rhythm is slow. This film is stable and important without losing details, and the emotional description is in place. With these foreshadowings, the teamwork behind the team's unity has such an appeal...
It was amazing to be able to...
By Amy 2022-03-20 09:01:14
When "Houston, we're in trouble" sounded, my heart tightened; when finally "Houston, I'm the Odyssey" finally sounded, my heart burst into tears with the cheering crowd; though, I know I'm watching a movie.
I know it wasn't just an unsuccessful space flight that moved me, it was the best things in human nature, bravery, confidence, worry, love, never giving up, wisdom in the face of adversity, and so on. There are also people who are dedicated, sincere, and single-mindedly dedicated to...
User comments
( 100 )
Add comments
By Davonte 2022-04-24 07:01:02
American theme blockbuster. There are also details embellished in the breath-taking! For example, when the mother and son are watching Tom come back in the play, when the child complains that the mother is nervously scratching him, this is a detail, and then the priest behind him comfortably touches the child's head, which is very...
By Rosario 2022-04-24 07:01:02
In fact, Gravity was filmed 20 years ago. ....
By Garnet 2022-04-24 07:01:02
This event itself is a very exciting story, constantly solving various unexpected problems, and finally successfully returning to Earth. The key lies in the adjustment of the mentality of the two leaders in the sky and the ground, and the transmission of this peaceful but firm mentality to...
By Quinn 2022-04-23 07:01:16
Another American patriotic...
By Sonny 2022-04-23 07:01:16
The movie itself is not that good. . . But the shot of the parachute opening is still moving. . . What's more, it's a real thing. ....
Gene Kranz: Gentlemen, at this moment, I want you all to forget the flight plan. From this moment on, we are improvising a new mission: How do we get our people home?
[Goes to the chalkboard, draws a big circle representing Earth, another smaller circle representing the moon, then draws a line from the Earth to just short of the moon]
Gene Kranz: They are here. Do we turn them around, straight back, direct abort?
[NASA controllers instantly start arguing]
Jerry Bostick - FIDO White: No, sir! No, sir! We get them on a free-return trajectory. It's the option with the fewest question marks for safety.
Gene Kranz: I agree with Jerry. We use the moon's gravity, slingshot them around.
R.E.T.R.O. White: No, the LEM will not support three guys for that amount of time. I mean, we've got to do a direct abort. We do an about-face, we bring the guys right home, right now.
Booster White: Get them back soon, absolutely.
Jerry Bostick - FIDO White: Look, we don't even know if the Odyssey's engine's even working. If there's been serious damage to this spacecraft...
GUIDO White: They blow up and they die!
R.E.T.R.O. White: That is not the argument! We're talking about time!
[Controllers argue again]
Gene Kranz: Okay, hold it. Let's hold it down. The only engine we got with enough power for a direct abort is the SPS on the service module. From what Lovell has told us, that could have been damaged in an explosion, so let's consider that engine dead. We light that thing up, it could blow the whole works. It's just too risky. We're not going to take that chance. About the only thing the command module is good for is reentry, so that leaves us with the LEM, which means free-return trajectory. Once we get the guys around the moon, we'll fire the LEM engine, make a long burn, pick up some speed, and get them home as quickly as we can.
John Young: [waking Ken Mattingly up] Good, you're not dead. I've been trying to get in touch with you for 45 minutes.
Ken Mattingly: Here's the order of what I want to do. I want to power up Guidance, E.C.S., Communications, warm up the pyros for the parachutes, and the command module thrusters.
John Aaron, EECOM Arthur: The thrusters are gonna put you over budget on amps, Ken.
Ken Mattingly: Well, they've been sitting at 200 below for four days, John. They've got to be heated.
John Aaron, EECOM Arthur: Fine. Then trade off the parachutes, something.
Ken Mattingly: Well, if the chutes don't open, what's the point?
John Aaron, EECOM Arthur: Ken, you're telling me what you need. I'm telling you what we have to work with at this point. I'm not making this stuff up.
Ken Mattingly: They're gonna need all these systems, John.
John Aaron, EECOM Arthur: We do not have the power, Ken. We just don't have it.
Ken Mattingly: Okay. I'm gonna go back and re-organize the sequencing again and find more power. Let's start from scratch. Clear the board.
John Aaron, EECOM Arthur: [covering his mic, to John Young] I don't know where the hell we're gonna find it.