2010: The Year We Make Contact

By Lukas 2022-03-25 09:01:10

Collaboration (this is not a movie review)

This isn't a movie review, it's an afterthought

"2010": This film has won a lot of Oscar nominations that have nothing to do with the plot, such as costume design, art design, etc., because the plot is really not good. Although this film is considered a sequel to "2001: A Space Odyssey", I don't know why it wasn't directed by Kubrick.

The movie lacks the contemplative stuff from A Space Odyssey, and there isn't much to explain about that black...

By Sigurd 2022-03-25 09:01:10

[Space Ghost Movie] The protector of intelligent creatures - black stone tablet?

Maybe I haven't watched "2001: A Space Odyssey", and I'm a bit confused watching "2010"... So what's the meaning of the black stone tablet? Seeing signs of intelligent life will help them turn Jupiter into a new sun and promote the survival and purification of life on Europa? So there are also black stone tablets on the earth. Are we also once protected by black stone tablets? There is also a black stone tablet on the moon. Is it possible that the moon may also have new creatures? And then...

By Hester 2022-03-25 09:01:10

pre-digital rhapsody

Old movie, at that time, computers were still in the stage where windows were not popularized. But because of limited conditions, the imagination is amazing. The beginning is a little creepy, creating a suspenseful atmosphere. The husband and wife study dolphins and keep dolphins at home. The space scene that should be simulated by the model, the so-called mysterious existence in space like a tombstone, and a black hole swallowing objects. The dead people mysteriously appear in front of...

By Valentina 2022-03-24 09:02:13

2010

Nine years after "2001: A Space Odyssey", Dr. Freud (Roy Scheider), the former director of the National Space Council, accepted the Soviet-American cooperation plan and led the designer of the Space Station Discovery, Dr. Ke Nao (John Leith). John Lithgow (played by John Lithgow) and Dr. Chandra (played by Bob Balaban), the founder of the HAL9000 computer, log in to the Soviet air station near Jupiter, and the Soviet astronaut Kabuko (played by Helen Mirren) Cooperate with others to connect...

By Kareem 2022-03-24 09:02:13

It's better to change the name to "Decryption 2001"

It is the singer's job to read the coordinate data, and it is the singer's pleasure to judge the sincerity of the coordinates.

　　Singers know that what they are doing is not a big deal, it's just picking up the slack, but it's a must do, and it's fun.

　　Speaking of fun, it was a fun place when the seed set sail from the home world, but then, since the war between the home world and the fringe world began, the fun has gradually diminished. Up to now, more than 10,000...

By Ezequiel 2023-09-02 16:35:29

It is nominally a sequel to "2001", but it is quite different in style from that classic, and has completely become a sci-fi film in the traditional sense. A very good note, the depiction of HAL is also more humanized. The background of the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union and the cooperation between the astronauts of the United States and the Soviet Union in the end also emphasize the background of the era of that era, with a clear anti-war...

By Roderick 2022-11-14 20:45:35

The sequel to 2001: A Space Odyssey, continuing the setting of 2001, the difference is that the director is different. However, the fusion is very harmonious, and it also explains more about the settings of the previous work. It's just that from now on, it turns out that it's best not to make sequels to classic films, and they are made by different people. Successful sequels are really rare. I think it's good that the director made more extensions to the previous work. It would be nice if there...

By Melyssa 2022-04-24 07:01:14

Compared with the previous work, it has more "human taste", and the plot is a lot richer, which is a supplement to 2001. But 2001 is a masterpiece after all, and this sequel cannot compare in terms of philosophical...

By Briana 2022-04-24 07:01:14

The film itself is not bad. As a sequel to the classic "2001", it is short in comparison, and it is difficult to surpass the artistic achievements and ideological depth of its...

By Owen 2022-04-24 07:01:14

I watched 2001 when I was a kid. Oh my god, what was that movie? It was dull and obscure. I remember my dad was always explaining it to me. I could understand a little bit, but this sequel is simple and clear. In the 1984 film, I read some comments and materials, and I answered a lot of questions. Don't say it's a continuation of the dog's tail. There must be arguments and foundations for nitpicking. At least it has completed its mission. The Queen's Russian is very...