12 Angry Men

12 Angry Men

  • Director: William Friedkin
  • Countries of origin: United States
  • Language: English
  • Release date: August 17, 1997
  • Sound mix: Dolby Digital
  • Aspect ratio: 1.85 : 1
  • Also known as: Doce hombres en pugna
  • "12 Angry Men" is a TV movie directed by William Friedkin, starring Jack Lemmon, George C. Scott, and Hume Cronin.
    The film is a remake of the film of the same name released in 1957. It tells the story of a juror who turned the verdict of a murder case on his own.

    Details

    • Release date August 17, 1997
    • Filming locations Raleigh Studios - 5300 Melrose Avenue, Hollywood, Los Angeles, California, USA
    • Production companies MGM Television

    Movie reviews

     ( 26 ) Add reviews

    • By Jovanny 2022-12-23 23:25:45

      study template

      When I watched "The Phone Booth" two years ago, I inevitably recalled "Twelve Angry Men". And flip out the disc to watch it again.
      In addition to being conquered by Henry Fonda's traditional acting style, this film, which squeezes all the plot in a sealed room, should be used by most film directors and screenwriters.
      "The Phone Booth" has more camera design, but it is still a little weaker than the design of the jury room - the latter does not allow the addition or subtraction of any...

    • By Josefina 2022-12-19 03:09:48

      On "Twelve Angry Men"

      The wonders of the world often make it impossible for people to use simple concepts to define one thing for one person, let alone make a conclusion. Everyone obtains his own philosophy of life from his life experience. It is impossible to say who is right and who is wrong. Simple "right and wrong" cannot cover the complexities of life. This is the helplessness of life, but also the wonder of life.

      The new version of "Twelve Angry Men", although I personally think that some parts are...

    • By Erling 2022-12-06 13:49:59

      The focus of law is on procedure, not truth

      I've seen the Chinese version of Twelve Citizens before, and it was amazing. Today I finally found the opportunity to look back at the US version of Twelve Angry Men. The case has not changed, and the plot is only slightly different according to national conditions. However, the viewing experience is still very good, and even in the process, I really want to revisit the Twelve Citizens to compare the differences in details. It is said that this version is almost a black-and-white version of...

    • By Roel 2022-11-30 10:48:00

      Respect other people's lives Respect your own personality

      Treat other people's lives, whether she is rich or poor, good or evil, you should treat your own life seriously; when your decision affects another person's life and death, no matter how small the impact, Everyone should be careful, this is respect for other people's lives, and it is also respect for one's own personality.
      What impressed me the most was the role played by Henry Fonda. He wasn't sure at first that the boy was guilty, just not so sure. It was his reasonable suspicion and...

    • By Theodore 2022-11-29 16:00:26

      The game of justice and prejudice

      The judgments are revised one by one, and each one is overturned. Perhaps it is a game between justice and prejudice. Everyone's subjective assumptions are related to their growth experience. This has caused a stumbling block that affects individuals’ rational judgments. Our demons are certain To a certain extent, it can be said that the world we have experienced erosion and occupation of the unknown world, but it is said that "the past belongs to the god of death, the future belongs to...

    User comments

      ( 54 ) Add comments

    • By Cameron 2023-09-24 20:09:35

      I just said why everyone in it speaks English, and I read the Russian version....

    • By Eino 2023-09-14 05:58:15

      Everyone inside is very good at acting, and Russian feels like chanting scriptures. The ending can be guessed, but the trial process is a little cloudy and makes me want to...

    • By Orion 2023-09-12 21:37:17

      I have a lot of doubt about the choice made by the 12 people in the ending: Is it to evade responsibility so as to let the boy fend for himself or to give the boy his...

    • By Alvera 2023-09-12 19:15:40

      Regarding the benchmark movie of "reasonable doubt", William Peters is still in it. At the time, I didn't know Gleason at the crime scene. Hahaha ~ 1957 classic version 12 Angry Men remake, this version is quite to my appetite, and later I also After watching the Russian version and the Chinese version of Twelve Citizens, they are actually good remakes~ If people today look at these jurors who admit death, they will definitely think that they are scumbags~ The civil law is different from this,...

    • By Betty 2023-09-08 00:17:58

      The truth is possible among us, and it is still possible for weak and selfish ordinary people to understand others and find the truth. The choice after obtaining the truth puts forward more stringent requirements on people. The Russians used the story to dig into their own problems, and it resonated. Even if only one of the 12 people insists on doing his part for change, there is a ray of hope for us and the society we live...

    Movie plot

    A New York youth accused of killing his father will be sentenced to death for first-degree murder. Eleven jurors have already ruled that the suspect is guilty. Only one judged that the situation was suspicious and insisted on raising objections. With patience and perseverance, he persuaded the other jurors to overturn the original intent, and finally vindicated this almost unjust case. Most of the time the film is performed in a narrow...
    more about 12 Angry Men Movie plot

    Movie quotes

    • Juror #8: Ever since we've walked into this room, you've acted like a self-appointed public avenger!

      Juror #3: Shut up...

      Juror #8: You want the boy to die for your own personal reasons, not because of the facts!

      [Juror #3 tries to get his hands on Juror #8, but some other jurors hold him back]

      Juror #8: You're a sadist!

      Juror #3: I'll kill ya!

      Juror #8: You don't really mean you'll kill me, do you?

    • Juror #4: Gentlemen, let me remind you this case is based on a reasonable and logical progression of facts. Please, let's keep it.

      Juror #11: Facts may be coated by the personalities of the people who present them. Let's not forget that.

    • Juror #10: [his last line, when asked if he still thinks the boy is guilty of murder] ... Oh, I *know* he's guilty; *all* his kind are guilty, and of far worse than murder. But I couldn't care less, because you've made it clear that you don't care either. You and them deserve each other. So I vote Not Guilty.