Budget
$350,000 (estimated)
Gross worldwide
$955
Movie reviews
( 104 )
Add reviews
By Dana 2022-04-23 07:01:08
Logical Thoughts in Twelve Angry Men
The ghetto, a unique dagger, reprimands from childhood, witness testimony, and poor English that is difficult to defend, the hard evidence is overwhelming and the truth is about to come out - this boy is the murderer of his father. There was no evidence to excuse him, and even his lawyers believed that the child was guilty. The jury of twelve and eleven made a judgment that conformed to the public's intuition and was guilty. The judge yawned in the courtroom, and a juror said,...
By Kennith 2022-04-23 07:01:08
When I found myself watching a law-related film, I felt a little ashamed of the law course I took in college. Because my following understanding and discussion may seem to professionals in the field of law to be nothing more than the most superficial point of view, but I dare to say it, even if it adds to the laughter.
Starting from the most basic thinking in jurisprudence, the core starting point for the actor to initiate this debate is:
By Darian 2022-04-23 07:01:08
This is the second time I've written a movie review. When I watched the movie, the front made me feel a little boring, and it was all lines. But the latter unfolded layer by layer, bit by bit, which caused me to think a lot. I think this is an immortal masterpiece!
1. different
All the others think he's guilty, and if I think he's guilty, this discussion doesn't need to go on, but I don't have a solid understanding of the...
By Dereck 2022-04-23 07:01:08
2021.8.20 Watch "Twelve Angry Men"
From one hour and two minutes:
Little Leader No. 1: Guilty
Little Angel No. 2: Innocence
Grumpy Dad No. 3: Guilty
Stock Broker No. 4: Guilty
Slum 5: Innocence
Worker No. 6: Not Guilty
No. 7 ball game hat brother: guilty
Patronus Architect 8: Innocence!
Old Man No. 9: Not Guilty
No. 10 irritable rhinitis brother: guilty
Clockmaker No. 11: Innocence
Brother No. 12 Soy Sauce: Guilty
❻ vs ❻, the rain and the fan...
By Curtis 2022-04-23 07:01:08
Today, I seriously brushed an old 1957 movie "Twelve Angry Men, it's so wonderful!"
I'm curious, does the judiciary in Western countries still use this jury system?
In our GJ's justice, who is responsible for researching such details? Who will decide the life or death of the suspect?
How many people are there in our life? When will it be? Where will it be? Because of what? Do you think deeply?
User comments
( 86 )
Add comments
By Beulah 2023-09-06 14:01:47
Many people think it's about justice and the art of war, and I think 12 Angry Men also represent a variety of people. In a secret jury room, someone confirms that it is the truth in order to believe a truth he thinks, because in addition to the guidance of public opinion, it may also lead to believe it because they want to satisfy a certain desire in their heart. It is never easy to justify one's own beliefs, because it comes from the selfishness that everyone...
By Adell 2023-08-01 22:15:35
The truth, or never the truth. But don't give up the truth, or don't give up trying to get close to the truth. At the end of the movie, who is the murderer is not so important...
By Thea 2023-07-10 02:39:56
It's very different to watch this movie after watching silk. The person who feels the decision of the truth has completely changed. Movies are very interesting, like Killing, The Man From Earth is a movie built with dialogue, how to make such a movie not boring? To have something to say. How can a person overturn a stereotype in the minds of others? It is to keep asking questions and giving questions, and others will naturally think. However, I think the jury system is a bit...
By Gaetano 2023-06-07 08:22:12
Great ensemble and performance, especially close-ups. In fact, I think in the end I have deviated from the original intention of Henry Fonda, but this is also a reproduction of the spirit of American law, which is...
By Lois 2023-04-28 03:43:24
The second brush of the archive is still wonderful. The lines, performances, and scheduling are top-notch; prejudice blinds the truth; the A-level film watched by a man who does not sweat is "Red Circle", and the actor sweats when he is questioned about the name of the B-level film. Henry Fonda wears a white suit, and the stubborn and arrogant No. 3 wears a black suit -> Western movie pros and cons...
Juror #7: You a Yankee fan?
Juror #5: No, Baltimore.
Juror #7: Baltimore? That's like being hit in the head with a crowbar once a day.
Juror #3: [when Juror #11 questions whether the boy would return home to retrieve the knife] Look, you voted guilty. What side are ya on?
Juror #11: I don't believe I have to be loyal to one side or the other. I'm simply asking questions.
Juror #8: I just want to talk.
Juror #7: Well, what's there to talk about? Eleven men in here think he's guilty. No one had to think about it twice except you.
Juror #10: I want to to ask you something: do you believe his story?
Juror #8: I don't know whether I believe it or not - maybe I don't.
Juror #7: So how come you vote not guilty?
Juror #8: Well, there were eleven votes for guilty. It's not easy to raise my hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it first.
Juror #7: Well now, who says it's easy?
Juror #8: No one.
Juror #7: What, just because I voted fast? I honestly think the guy's guilty. Couldn't change my mind if you talked for a hundred years.
Juror #8: I'm not trying to change your mind. It's just that... we're talking about somebody's life here. We can't decide it in five minutes. Supposing we're wrong?
Juror #7: Supposing we're wrong! Supposing this whole building should fall down on my head. You can suppose anything!
Juror #8: That's right.
