-
Lane 2021-10-20 19:00:00
"Memories of Murder" 8.6, "Zodiac" 7.0. Can i laugh? I think this kind of film is not a simple case analysis, and the content and information reflected in the context of the times are more worthy of aftertaste. The same is true of Julie's "Sustaining the...
-
Emmalee 2021-10-20 18:59:58
The film critics have mixed reviews for this film, and the reviews are even two extremes. Personally, I almost watched this 157-minute film with good eyeballs. The film comprehensively describes the painstaking detection process of a serial homicide case more than 40 years ago. Although the case is not solved according to the procedures, everyone knows who the murderer is. The film is nuanced, very large, with intricate details, and the actors perform well. A good...
-
Tremayne 2021-10-20 18:59:56
Vinci's style is that it will be boring if it is done well, and it will be a good suspense film if it is done well. Obviously not done well this...
-
Noelia 2021-10-20 18:59:56
In fact, it can be classified as a pseudo-documentary. It is not the path of a traditional crime film. It is completely misguided. It will definitely feel cheating to watch it with the mentality of watching a crime suspense film. . . The protagonist is not zodiac, but all the people who have investigated the case for more than two decades. The suspenseful point is that everyone meets some of the characteristics of the murderer, but you can never find who this person is. . . The discussion in...
-
Helen 2021-10-20 18:59:55
I fully understand many people's complaints about the boring and boring film, but this kind of gentle and relaxed rhythm and running account-like expression is completely...
-
Julian 2021-10-20 18:59:55
My husband and I agreed that the murder in the Zodiac was not committed by one person. The first two hours of the film were boring, and it didn't become interesting until the cartoonist really started investigating. The real climax of the film was the moment when the film projectionist said that the posters were painted by himself. However, the ending gives a feeling of a climax for a second after flying for two...
-
Genoveva 2021-10-20 18:59:54
The wonderful thing is that there is no miracle in reality, and there is no clever arrangement. Reasoning is sometimes tedious or even...
-
Demarco 2021-10-20 18:59:54
Just like the 12 scales of a clock, the force is very...
-
Claude 2021-10-20 18:59:53
Calm and methodical. David Fincher finally corrected his mentality and gave up the grandstanding tricks in The Seven Deadly Sins and Fight...
-
Daniela 2021-10-20 18:59:52
There is a kind of movie that always reminds me after watching it, and even feels endless aftertaste. This is...
Zodiac Comments
-
Melvin Belli: Inspector Toschi.
[holds up bloodied shirt piece]
Melvin Belli: It is my belief that this is a window into this man's soul. Killing is his compulsion. Even though he tries to ignore it, it drives him. It's in his blood.
Dave Toschi: Maybe. Or maybe he just likes the attention.
-
[Graysmith visits with Ken Narlow in Napa]
Robert Graysmith: Does the name Rick Marshall mean anything to you?
Ken Narlow: [it does] What are you after?
Robert Graysmith: What have you got?
Ken Narlow: Hypothetically, you just named my favorite suspect in the whole case. This is off the record. Couple of years back, I was trying to get Marshall's prints. I handed him a photo. He looks at it. He's about to give it back and he says, "My goodness, I got fingerprints all over this." And he wipes them off.
Robert Graysmith: Why didn't you test him for handwriting?
Ken Narlow: Because when they finally did run his prints... they cleared him against the one in Stine's cab.
Robert Graysmith: So it's not him?
Ken Narlow: Maybe yes, maybe no.
Robert Graysmith: No? What do you mean?
Ken Narlow: Zodiac left gloves behind at the scene. If he had the foresight to bring gloves with him, how the hell's he gonna accidentally leave a print behind?
Robert Graysmith: But it was in the victim's blood.
Ken Narlow: Could have been one of the bystanders, or a cop just reaches out... Boom. False print.
Robert Graysmith: But that print disqualified 2,500 suspects.
Ken Narlow: Which is why we used handwriting.
Robert Graysmith: But not for Rick Marshall.
Ken Narlow: S.F.P.D. saw a handwritten sign in the window of his house, decided it looked nothing like the Z letters, so they moved on.
Robert Graysmith: How do they know Rick Marshall wrote the sign?
Ken Narlow: [smiles] My thoughts exactly. Rick Marshall was a Navy man. He received code training. He was also a projectionist at a silent film theater.
Robert Graysmith: How do I get a copy of Rick Marshall's handwriting?
Ken Narlow: Three ways. One, get a warrant; which you can't. Two, get him to volunteer; which he won't.
Robert Graysmith: Yeah, and three?
Ken Narlow: Get creative.
