-
Nicole 2023-09-04 14:34:05
I always felt that Gudrun's torture to Gerald was a little too much. Maybe he didn't really love her, but she didn't give much real affection, and finally caused Gerald to be disheartened and completely "rested". In contrast, Rupert's pair are more straightforward. He loves Ursula and Gerald, and it's vague about whether they're doing it. Why can't people have two kinds of love at the same time, but I think it has to be based on pure...
-
Jason 2023-08-10 05:39:19
Appearance films, try to maintain medium shots and facial close-ups, organically combine the indifference of death in the cold face with the common quality of consciousness between glaciers, and the appearance itself expresses a pure power, which is related to the natural environment. An attempt to find a common force among objects of different...
-
Jeffry 2023-06-19 09:23:22
love... how is it...
-
Zechariah 2023-06-03 02:31:29
The whole movie gave me a sense of ignorance during the viewing process, and I couldn't get what the director wanted to express at all, but the nakedness that could be seen at any time caught my eye (...) The music in this film is also relatively bad, Therefore, the most worth mentioning of this film is the performance, especially Alan Bates, although Granda's performance is good, but I don't think it has reached the award-winning level. In addition, I don't know why I think there is something...
-
Idell 2023-05-24 11:02:21
Movies adapted from famous novels are always unsatisfactory. I am not a Lawrence fan and have never seen the original. I just feel that the words and deeds of the characters in the film are inexplicable, and the language described in the text makes people feel pretentious. Lens language is good. After the passion, the shot of the man and woman is followed by the newlywed couple sinking to the bottom of the lake. The movements are still the same, which is very impactful; the scene of the two...
-
Johnson 2023-03-25 00:45:23
Lawrence, really is not a man of the same...
-
Sterling 2023-02-25 06:14:46
A comedy with an innocent title, actually pornography, murder, dew point, and homosexuality. Opened in...
-
Armando 2023-02-11 15:05:46
What a shame, I just wish I didn’t live in the era of sexual... -
Jerrod 2023-02-05 22:07:51
The background is light but not hidden, the characters with strong emotions, the subtle opposition and separation of life and death, the drive or restriction of desire. The raw, natural, artistic strong expressiveness is also striking. Some are decent and stressful, while others are vulgar and more self-enjoying. Women need men, and men need not only women but men. The fact that Glenda Jackson, who played one of the two sisters, won an Oscar shows that it's still important to be...
-
Ferne 2023-01-14 15:18:51
Being unfamiliar with the content of the original is a bizarre experience. The rhythm of the pictures is good, and it is very contemporary, but the content and characters often feel beyond the era, beyond the beginning of the last century in the story, and even beyond the film's 1969. Called Women in Love, many places are more like Men in Love, or completely overturn these concepts, making people wonder what Love is and whether Love has a meaning. The women in and around the relationship in the...
Women in Love Comments
-
Hermione Roddice: Immortality of the soul? More appropriate for an execution, I should have thought, than for a wedding.
-
Hermione Roddice: What are you doing?
Rupert Birkin: Catkins.
Hermione Roddice: Really? What do you learn about them?
Rupert Birkin: Well from these little red bits, the nuts come - if they receive pollen from these long danglers.
Hermione Roddice: Little red flames. Little red flames, are the beautiful! I think they're so beautiful.
Rupert Birkin: Did you never notice them before?
Hermione Roddice: No. Never before.
Rupert Birkin: Well, now you'll always see them.
Hermione Roddice: Now I shall always see them. Thank you, so much, for showing me. I think they're so beautiful. Little red flames.