-
Gudrun 2023-07-31 00:25:18
3.5 stars, it’s a bit slow, but if you really put in it, you will taste the taste. The perspective is not unique, but the portrayal of the characters is very vivid. This kind of vividness is not expressed by "screaming" but by heart. . . Parker still looks a little younger in this role, but he worked hard and he has a natural upright face to some extent. In the supporting role, whether it is many or few plays, he has played his acting skills, and he especially likes the performance of...
-
Destini 2023-07-29 15:26:45
What about Gregory Peck... well, about discipline and order... well......
-
Jeramy 2023-07-17 04:11:43
People are not machines, so wars and armies torment a person deeply in a way that destroys...
-
Dejah 2023-07-06 12:48:30
Pike's performance is as dry as ever, but the decisive officer suits him well. Although the best supporting actor prefers Richardson in "The Heiress," Jagger's performance is also...
-
Joana 2023-07-05 21:22:44
I really hate the original protagonist's character design and similar wartime theories. His way of governing the army only conforms to the general trend of the United States thinking that it lost its advantage in air combat against Germany at the time, so it used the air force like cattle. The way is better than Chees. The number of flying missions increased from 25 to 30 and then to 35. As a result, less than 5k people in the mighty eighth22.5w war were admitted to be suffering from trauma. Is...
-
Justen 2023-06-22 19:18:24
This film is a standard leadership + management teaching film. The best way to watch this film is to watch it with a group of colleagues as an instructional film, pausing each paragraph for discussion, summarizing and analyzing the questions and challenges raised in the previous paragraph, and thinking about possible responses to the next paragraph. (Tips, each paragraph ends with a door closing action. Once the door closes in the film, the discussion can be...
-
Rachelle 2023-06-15 12:37:31
This film is a case study when we study "leadership under press" in class, so the teacher regards it as a "management style" research film, not a drama...
-
Stephania 2023-06-09 04:33:49
The length of the film can be deleted at least 30 minutes. More than an hour before, he was procrastinating, and he taught a team management teaching class that had nothing to do with air combat. The depiction of the group portraits is also superficial and rigidly stylized. Without the final air battle scene and the so-called "human limit" to point to, the whole movie...
-
Jermain 2023-06-05 20:14:51
I just watched "Medic Newman" played by Peck the day before yesterday. I don’t know what Newman, who is kind, gentle and caring about each individual, will think of Savage. In the name of improving morale and iron discipline, we send soldiers who are tired, fearful and troubled by PTSD. The act of going to heaven to...
-
Nikolas 2023-06-01 23:16:48
If it wasn't for the boss sitting next to him and explaining it from time to time, I really don't know that there are so many management ideas behind the war blockbuster. I find that everyone around the company can be found in the characters in the film, which is...
Twelve O'Clock High Comments
Extended Reading
-
General Savage: No, Sir. I didn't hear a thing. It must have been radio malfunction.
General Pritchard: Do you mean you're going to stick to that fairy tale?
General Savage: Yes, sir. There's one more thing you might as well know, sir. The 918th got through today, and bombed the target when nobody else did. And if Providence ever drops into my lap, another chance like that to give this group the pride it out to have in itself, I may have radio malfunction again, sir.
-
Col. Davenport: [referring to Gen. Savage's complete collapse in a state of shock] Did you ever see how bright a light bulb is just before the filament burns out? I think they call it maximum effort.
