-
Sonny 2022-03-20 09:02:16
(7.0) Not a very American courtroom movie. The prosecution and the defense were not a wonderful confrontation, and the happy ending was a happy ending regardless of the procedure. The personal pursuits of the protagonists throughout the story have also been suppressing the case itself without complementing each other. Rampling's role may be redundant. In some clips, Lumet still plays at a master level. Plus I still think the older Paul Newman has more...
-
Idell 2022-03-19 09:01:06
Highly introspective work. When reason tries to replace justice, it arranges desire to sit opposite conscience. The close-ups of the characters are permanently exposed to the silent, public environment, and they show innocence and integrity to the people outside the painting. The camera is just one of them. No soundtrack. Ramplin is like a ghost in it. At the end of the film, her posture is similar to that of the goddess of justice. Her balance has come to fruition, but the justice of the...
-
Letha 2022-03-19 09:01:06
Whether you choose the TOP10 of Lu Meite's creative career or the TOP10 of film history and legal themes, you should have a place in "The Great Trial"~~ I like "Twelve Angry Men", "Killing a Mockingbird", "Peachy Blood Case", "A Hot Day Afternoon" "Fans of movies like "TV Station", don't miss this...
-
Milton 2022-03-19 09:01:06
Can anyone tell me what Ramplin's character does in it? Isn't the whole story more important without her?...
-
Deja 2022-03-18 09:01:05
Very restrained, not in line with contemporary aesthetics anymore. The character change is...
-
Destin 2022-03-18 09:01:05
The shots are really good, the several locations selected for the composition, light and shadow are all great, and Newman's acting is also very good, which is very distressing. But I don't know if this is a court movie. I feel that the final verdict of the jury is a bit wishful thinking. Of course, this is where I have never understood the jury system. In the end, time and shadows are particularly beautiful, and the final ending makes me like it better. Lamplin is so beautiful, and finally...
-
Cathy 2022-03-17 09:01:05
another...
-
Kevon 2022-03-17 09:01:05
Paul's performance is very exciting (but it's still a role in the safe zone)! There is a slight urgency at the end, but the standard is still very...
-
Johnathan 2022-03-16 09:01:05
The screenwriter David Mehmet completely copied a piece of the bloody murder case. If you have seen its prototype, you will see the decline of Hollywood, originality is not mentioned, and even morally naive. Paul Newman also had to see a conscience discovery from a vegetative person, and James Stewart directly implied that the prisoner was perjurying. And Newman's performance. . . It makes people blush! When a beauty is eager to prove her talent, she will show her cowardice. Only Charlotte...
-
Sam 2022-03-16 09:01:05
[3.5/5.0] I don’t like most court scenes that are not well filmed. In addition to the lengthy and dullness, there is also the moral persuasion of finally rising to the sky, which is basically the protagonist’s power. The role of Charlotte Lamplin is very...
The Verdict Comments
-
Mickey Morrissey: [Mickey is trying to convince Frank not to take the case to trial] Do you know who the attorney for the Archdiocese is? Ed Concannon!
Frank Galvin: He's a good man...
Mickey Morrissey: He's a good man? Heh, heh, he's the Prince of fucking Darkness! He'll have people testifying they saw her waterskiing in Marblehead last summer. Now look, Frank, don't *fuck with this case!
-
Frank Galvin: [to the judge] You couldn't hack it as a lawyer. You were a bag man for the boys downtown and you still are, I know about you.