The Thing Comments

Joana 2021-11-27 08:01:18

The special effects makeup of the strange shape is done well, and the parasitic method is similar to that of the strange shape, and they are all imported from the mouth. Several shots in the trailer did not appear in the film. The whole film was shot in a satisfactory manner, without thrills and...

Vivianne 2021-11-27 08:01:18

The old version of John Carpenter in 1982 is really a classic. It's amazing to look at it. I think that Zhong Hao has been as interesting as Alien. Although this episode is a prequel, it is actually the same as the old version. The shooting method, the story, and the atmosphere are very similar. It is completely using today's special effects. Pay tribute to the old version. Fortunately, this type of sleepy beast fighting horror science fiction film is worth watching. The design of The Thing is...

Leonard 2021-11-27 08:01:18

The story that the big spider spirit and the powerful superwoman have to...

Jerel 2021-11-27 08:01:18

Bad movie I don’t believe that an alien with a high IQ who can build such a great aircraft is a primitive and violent physical organ exposed (alien is a monster, it’s not necessary to use a monster to describe...

Jada 2021-11-27 08:01:18

The essence of the original is lost, just a sci-fi horror film that is not too bad. What bothers me most is why it is obviously a prequel, but there are so many copy and paste of the original work? And it's a pity that Joel Edgerton hit back soy...

Tiana 2021-11-27 08:01:18

Let’s not talk about whether the bridge is a bit old-fashioned, but the shooting is really good, such as creating a tense and suspenseful atmosphere, and real bloody special effects. I like the final...

Emie 2021-11-27 08:01:18

The monster is disgusting enough, but it is said to be almost the same as the original. . . I haven’t seen the original but I can guess the end,...

Mae 2021-11-27 08:01:18

The story of up to two days, the location has changed from broad day to night... Which plane of Antarctica is...

Shirley 2021-11-27 08:01:18

As a prequel, this remake is more like "copy-and-paste" the old version. Although the technology is far from the level of 1982, the horror index is greatly reduced. The most important reason is that the new version of the character no longer has the IQ and the old version. Emotional intelligence, mutual suspicion and killing were not ruthless enough, and the ending became without suspense. It can only be said that the directors of the new version are well versed in the routine patterns of such...

Cecile 2021-11-27 08:01:18

In fact, by swapping the identities of the protagonists and the aliens, you can get the routine of most sci-fi adventure movies. Human beings are always more afraid of the unknown than calmly and kindly and self-controlly, which also contributed to the occurrence of tragedies in disguise; It's a very qualified film, but it's a bit weird to be positioned. Horror films are not horrible and CULT films are not disgusting. Then it is considered a science fiction thriller. A sincere work can be...