-
Nelda 2022-03-26 09:01:05
The special effects of the monster are well done, but the character depiction does not have the essence of the 82 version, but some details can be well connected with the 82 version, after all, it is a...
-
Frank 2022-03-26 09:01:05
It is said that the 1982 version is 10,000 times better, but I think this prequel is already pretty good. Although the logic is a bit unreasonable, the story is basically guessed, but it is really pretty. It's especially effective in...
-
Alden 2022-03-26 09:01:05
John Carpenter's sci-fi horror classic, Mutant Type III, opens with a Norwegian helicopter chasing a sled dog through the ice and snow of Antarctica. The sled dogs escape into an American research camp, leading to the whole story later. This prequel goes back to the origins of the story, how the Norwegians discovered UFOs and inadvertently brought them back to life. However, the process is similar to the original version, and it is difficult to play new...
-
Savannah 2022-03-26 09:01:05
The subtitles made me vomit, and I couldn't hold my head up. Fortunately, there were a little surprise in the back, otherwise it would be...
-
Monserrat 2022-03-26 09:01:05
This is not a bullshit prequel, it is clearly a remake! Such a good subject was wasted. In the end, I didn't even explain the plot clearly, and it was inexplicably related to the original...
-
Tyshawn 2022-03-25 09:01:08
Scott's mistress. The monster special effects are well done, not much better than the old version, but not much...
-
Tanner 2022-03-25 09:01:08
The original version was not fortunate to be seen, the JC version is a polar version of the parasite, and the Dutchman's third-degree remake is more like a torn version of the replicator (the latter is the thing in SG1). The idea of connecting the end of the film with the JC version probably came from Ronald D. Moore, but I don’t know how much Dharma’s original script was overturned and re-written. The magic cube in the spaceship is very similar to the one in the star of the base. Anyway, the...
-
Jazmin 2022-03-25 09:01:08
The essence of the original work is the suspicion and killing between the hosts. The prequel only highlights the special effects. The old-fashioned intimidation techniques and the final heroine finds that she has to transform into a post-queen ending. Compared with the original work, it is really...
-
Guillermo 2022-03-25 09:01:08
The story in front of the old version of the monster has the same main line, the sense of suffocation is well created, the special effects are very good, and it is much more vivid and vivid than the old version of the...
-
Katlyn 2021-11-27 08:01:18
The director is very cheap, and sacrificed the claustrophobic space that could have been a fuss in order to cater to the taste of commercial films. In fact, the audience is also cheap, all to get a glimpse of the monster. The first seventy minutes was quite a suspenseful horror, and the next ten minutes suddenly became SF... I feel that the heroine is really eye-catching, the BOSS battle is really tortuous, the ending is really complete, and the value of a commercial film has been achieved. If...
The Thing Comments
-
Sam Carter: I wanna know how the Cavaliers are doing?
Kate Lloyd: Hmm. I don't follow football.
Sam Carter: It's a basketball team. They play basketball.
Jameson: Barely. They're the Cavaliers, man.
-
Sam Carter: And the last place you want to be is cooped up with a dozen of Norwegian guys.
Director: Matthijs van Heijningen Jr.
Language: English,Norwegian,Danish Release date: October 14, 2011