-
Tremayne 2022-04-20 09:01:40
A group of people, rare no-man's land, monsters, dying one after another, suspicious of each other, heroic characters appearing accompanied by one or several unconvincing paranoia, all dead, or the director plays a trick to leave it to the audience's imagination Ending...
-
Amelie 2022-04-20 09:01:40
Just these bad tricks, dragging out things from 30 years ago, if they are not retro, they are bad...
-
Daphney 2022-04-20 09:01:40
Carter was the only one who was fucked to death without transforming (maybe he didn't transform at all), and that's when I was really horrified. It is a pity that the director and screenwriter did not go further in this...
-
Nyasia 2022-04-20 09:01:40
The 2011 computer special effects "Monster" still doesn't feel as fleshy, disgusting and sensual as the 1982 special effects makeup "Monster". The story is basically borrowing the shape of the old version and using new technology to show it, but the suspenseful atmosphere has been weakened a lot, and it is more about the scenes of monsters fighting humans: Compared with "blood test", "tooth test" is slightly more obvious. Funny; the character design of the heroine comes from the heroine Ellen...
-
Ludwig 2022-04-20 09:01:40
Compared with the 82 version, it is much worse, and it has done a lot of conscious connection with the previous work, which is not a bad place. In addition, it is really boring, and even the taste is not heavy enough, and it was overwhelmed by the 82...
-
Dorris 2022-04-20 09:01:40
It's called a prequel, and it's actually a remake. The plot and structure are exactly the same. Unlike the original version, which is full of men, this new work has added two female characters, and the protagonist has also become a heroine like Ripley. Unfortunately, the actors are too tender , the forced leadership and tough guy style do not match the image and temperament. The monster has changed from the realistic model special effects in the original to the CG image, which is a bit flashy....
-
Crystal 2022-04-20 09:01:40
On the basis of version 82, the setting that monsters cannot clone inorganic substances is added, and a little trick is played. The double-headed spider monster is very scary, but unfortunately it does not go further than the 82 version from the core. In addition, because the 82 edition mentioned that the cause was the Norwegian scientific expedition team, so the story of this work had to be arranged in the Norwegian base, but the little hero who lived to the end was still a pair of American...
-
Nicklaus 2022-03-28 09:01:02
How do you say it is a tribute film? I haven't seen the original version. I can't comment. In terms of monsters, this insect-like monster with high IQ can copy and fit. It's still relatively new, but all kinds of illogical I grabbed the female pig's feet, why did Nima just pull her out and throw her on the ground instead of killing her directly! !...
-
Frances 2022-03-28 09:01:02
It's great, I really can't resist a movie like this. Not to mention that the heroine is Winstead, her aura in Die Hard 4 is not lost to Bruce Willis at all, and coupled with the movie's tribute to Alien, the cold and pale polar atmosphere created is simply charcoal-roasted garlic. Scallops, I'm...
-
Ellen 2022-03-28 09:01:02
A mix of prequel and remake. The hostess is good. A pity master. The monsters are disgusting, mentally retarded, and there are too many sci-fi elements. Without the suspicious atmosphere of the previous...
The Thing Comments
-
Sam Carter: I wanna know how the Cavaliers are doing?
Kate Lloyd: Hmm. I don't follow football.
Sam Carter: It's a basketball team. They play basketball.
Jameson: Barely. They're the Cavaliers, man.
-
Sam Carter: And the last place you want to be is cooped up with a dozen of Norwegian guys.
Director: Matthijs van Heijningen Jr.
Language: English,Norwegian,Danish Release date: October 14, 2011