The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Comments

Manuel 2022-03-22 09:01:26

. . . . http://gtest.sina.com.cn/question.php?id=377 Option C Zaphod Beeblebrooks: In the film, he's a lunatic, a fool. A galactic thief with two heads and three arms, his other identity is the president of the Galactic Empire. Wearing clothes to get the worst award often attracts everyone's attention. How do you say ~ ~ you...

Alden 2022-03-22 09:01:26

Probably only a post-Imperial Briton could pull off such a nonsensical drama, with no values, certainly and certainly no values ​​at all. Thanks and despise TLF's Chinese subtitles, I made a lot of mistakes, which led to a greater distance between the film and the original...

Celestine 2022-03-22 09:01:26

The answer of the ultimate question...

Bryce 2022-03-21 09:01:30

It's not easy to see a beautiful girl and such a wonderful and breathtaking background setting. Nicholas Adam's book must be read if you have the opportunity! The application of irony on the Wogang family is really cool~ The episodes about dolphins before and after the film are also very interesting~ Strong top~ It should be...

Melvin 2022-03-21 09:01:30

❶ Demolition is full of irony; ❷ The ultimate answer: 42, the ultimate question: "Deep Thought" has created another computer processing - another world (ie the earth), the employer is a mouse, and all mankind is their test product And let humans think they are experiments; ❸ Stacked with cold...

Maximo 2021-10-22 14:41:30

Not as good as I imagined, and I don't like British humor. The 2005 movie looked like it was in the 70s and 80s. It suddenly remembered the 1973 "Fools in Science City". The big head robot is really good, and a few clips are also good, but I don’t like this style, IMDB only scored 6.7. The creativity and ending are okay, I always feel that I didn't shoot well. 2013.8.25...

Ernestina 2021-10-22 14:41:29

The movie version aggravated the love scene, and the style was also a lot more optimistic. I remember that in the original book, the rats were very good at the end, and Earth 2.0 was also ordered to stop construction. In short, the movie still came to a happy ending. , The original work is darker and more atmospheric. As an entertainment product, movies still dare not completely destroy humanity, the earth, and human self-centeredness~~ Then, if you don’t read the book, the movie seems a bit...

Alisa 2021-10-22 14:41:29

Barely two points. After eleven years, the second brush, I still went to sleep. This film, like the original, is a British souvenir creation. Only the British have this kind of cute and cute idea of ​​their own. The starring Freeman is also the representative face of this kind of film, but this kind of broken mouth, panic, The image of the face of a British farmer, most people just think that their self-feeling good is a mental disability. The earth was demolished at the beginning, and another...

Viviane 2021-10-22 14:41:29

This is a movie made by fans, and the characteristic of this kind of thing is that it may be terrible and not integrated. From a narrative point of view, it is messy, but there are always a few points that make you think "hahaha is really good." . In the end, I actually wanted to spell out this sentence for a long time: Goodbye, thank you for the fish, we are going to the restaurant at the end of the universe, by the way, we will talk about life, the universe and everything, don't panic, it is...

Kirstin 2021-10-22 14:41:29

The earth is a product commissioned by mice. The answer to all questions in the universe is 42,...