-
Tara 2021-12-11 08:01:32
Although all the places involved in popular science are not scientific, the whole story structure is completely empty, and the characters are completely shriveled... well, this is obviously a bad movie. Even so, don't take your mind and spend an hour with it (because the special effects are very poor in 2003, so it almost doubles the speed in the whole process) (please learn how to tell stories in China). Back then, "We Love Science" gave a long introduction, which made me look forward to it...
-
Annalise 2021-12-11 08:01:32
Now it seems that the special effects of many scenes are a bit stale, of course, there are also relatively good ones, such as the Golden Gate Bridge. The characters have a slightly facial makeup. Let’s not talk about various technical bugs, it’s science fiction movies...
-
Bennie 2021-12-11 08:01:32
What happened to the disaster movie? Is it to show us the power and greatness of...
-
Sherman 2021-12-11 08:01:32
There is no shock beyond imagination, but at least it looks like this. The sudden collapse of the film's opening is more than handled by Sia Maran. Thunder strikes the Golden Gate Bridge and Rome really HIGH. Is the section of the pigeon mass walking a tribute to Hitchcock-it looks like a...
The Core Comments
-
Talma Stickley: Endeavour, guidance is bad. You are now one-two-niner miles off-course.
Maj. Rebecca Childs: Uh, roger, Huston. We kind of noticed. Is that...?
Talma Stickley: Los Angeles. That is confirmed.
-
Dr. Josh Keyes: I think we are in the wrong place here...
Serge Leveque: Yeah, we're in the wrong place...
General Thomas Percell: No. If you were in the wrong place, you'd have already been shot.
Serge Leveque: That's a hell of a greeting.