-
Eddie 2023-04-01 19:09:45
2015.04.20. Review. Proletarians, keep this in mind!
-
Scot 2023-01-13 02:17:48
This film is beyond reproach as a model of experimentation in the performance of the art form, but it deserves an objective view in terms of its appeal and provocative nature. After all, the content it discusses is strongly subjective, the characters are heavily masked, and the position is one-sided. . There should be no problem in making a noir film without ideology with the director's skill. The problem is that the director's ability to tell stories is not as good as the use of...
-
Jerald 2023-01-07 12:39:18
84/100 #6800# First of all, of course, it deviates from tradition, such as the "abandonment" of stories and characters, such as editing sometimes connected by symbols and spatial composition, etc. Its vigor is often seen in a director's debut work. , and then the film shows an understanding of politics and philosophy as rich as its understanding of film...
-
Katlyn 2022-12-07 15:29:50
Eisenstein's first film is already at this level: the story is fast-paced, the shots are fluid and varied, not to mention the most memorable ending of the classic cut of the killing of the strikers and the slaughter of the livestock. The brewing of the strike, the fuse, the hardships in the process, the use of rogue proletarians by the ruling class to destroy the strike, and the final end in blood, Eisenstein seems to be showing a "standard strike textbook"! Telling the audience how the working...
-
Jackson 2022-12-04 15:48:56
The lights go out, the gas runs out, the docks stop, the iron ore runs out, the wires are cut, the railway digs, the military factory burns, the newspaper office closes, the dagger appears, the bomb cracks, the king flees, the chariot is blocked, the police show, the soldiers gather, the sun is dark, Wild blood, flying electricity to kill eyes, global tongue-in-cheek, in drama, Russian revolution! ——Liang Qichao, "The Influence of the Russian...
-
Vaughn 2022-09-27 23:27:54
8. There is a vague prototype of the...
-
Sandy 2022-09-23 14:49:58
This film is the debut of the Soviet film theorist and director Eisenstein. It shows the beginning and end of a strike movement in six chapters. The film was regarded by Pravda as "the first truly proletarian film". He exemplified his documentary style by replacing the usual "plot", individual protagonists, star performances and sets of previous films with "vaudeville montages", crowd scenes, genre actors, and location...
-
Kathryne 2022-09-19 06:05:39
Clear and beautiful. very...
-
Jasmin 2022-09-15 05:27:07
In fact, some scenes are stronger than the battleship...
-
Earl 2022-09-10 23:50:46
The different social classes are represented by two phone calls, the characters are compared by the image of animals, the cruel exploitation of the proletariat by the capitalists is compared by the juice squeezer, the scene of the butcher killing pigs and the tsarist Russian army's treatment of the strikers. Slaughter, among these expressions, some seem blunt to today's eyes, but it is these naive methods that lay the foundation of the film's...
Stachka Comments
Extended Reading
-
Opening Title Card: The strength of the working class is in its organization. Without the organization of the masses, the proletariat is nothing. An organized proletariat is everything. Good organization means unity of action, the unity of practical activity. Lenin, 1907
-
Title Card: At the factory, all is calm. BUT. The boys are restless.