-
Ladarius 2023-09-23 06:45:18
8.5/10. ①The beginning and end of a failed but tragic strike movement during the Tsarist period. ②A lot of superimposed montages, quick montages, close-up face montages, and sideshow montages, such as the two scenes of worker riots at the end of chapter 5 and chapter 6 + being suppressed (that massacre of workers + killing cattle may have inspired Apocalypse Now ”), but the overall montage application level is quite different from Potemkin and October, and some juggling montages are too...
-
Angelo 2023-08-22 03:22:28
7.3; The last chapter is still the best, the complex spatial structure and the resulting intra-shot montage, and the musical-style single-shot length control. But this film undoubtedly exposed the ignorance of the...
-
Ed 2023-08-17 06:03:52
When the people are being swept away by the water guns of tyranny, no matter what, they have to be matched with one who can't afford to hurt...
-
Sherwood 2023-07-11 20:57:59
i think it takes time before i realize how important this film...
-
Norberto 2023-07-02 17:31:46
The film is a perfect example of Eisenstein's talent. All sorts of clever camera setups, mise-en-scène, and dazzling editing are not the hallmarks of a directorial debut. His mastery of multi-line stories and the use of his montage theory greatly enhance the film's dramatic tension. In addition to the group play, the portrayal of independent characters is also very interesting. Although the story itself is driven by class consciousness, it is still a great work of...
-
Madeline 2023-06-30 05:45:25
There are even beggars! This one is too esoteric, especially the beggar gang part... Such a complicated plot. The animal elements are wonderful! There are a lot of montages I don't understand, but the montages of squeezing and slaughtering are awesome! There are enough extras, and the simple and rude, exaggerated performance of the comedy effect is really good, and the version of the soundtrack is praised! I really enjoy watching silent movies and listening to the soundtrack. The logic is...
-
Lucinda 2023-06-21 18:26:44
Eisenstein's debut feature found that the common feature of the political-art films of the former Soviet Union is that there must be subtitles quoting Lenin's famous words at the beginning of the film. This film is very interesting. The subtitles are marked: Screenwriter: Proletariat; Editor-in-Chief: Prey Tenev; Screening: The Theatre of the First Workers of the Proletariat. It can be seen that the social function of the political-art films of the former Soviet Union is precisely the excellent...
-
Dwight 2023-05-31 20:55:20
Worship the master, let go of the ideology first, the technical skills are really powerful and avant-garde, btw I think the soundtrack of the re-engraved version is actually very...
-
Lilla 2023-05-22 07:30:54
The early works haven't broken away from some formalism, but the talent is already great. The most memorable scene is the scene where the workers lift the crane, and the clips before and after even remind people of An Gong many years later (of course, the phone is also like that). Often wondered if Eisenstein would have made more modern work, industrial and political (on how the first thaw later developed The original tradition is all over again)...
-
Reanna 2023-04-17 11:57:44
Sergei M. Eisenstein's directorial...
Stachka Comments
Extended Reading
-
Opening Title Card: The strength of the working class is in its organization. Without the organization of the masses, the proletariat is nothing. An organized proletariat is everything. Good organization means unity of action, the unity of practical activity. Lenin, 1907
-
Title Card: At the factory, all is calm. BUT. The boys are restless.