-
Myles 2023-09-28 00:17:10
What the...
-
Aditya 2023-09-17 15:37:58
turned into science...
-
Frances 2023-09-06 17:01:51
6.5 points, the plot seems to be bizarre, but it is actually a relatively restored original. The original work of "Midnight Bell" is a sci-fi film similar to "The Matrix". The director insisted that it be made into a horror film, which caused the latter to appear nondescript. In chronological order, this is the second film, and it was filmed in 1998 like the first film. In this part, Asakawa died quite sloppily, and the pseudo second part is equivalent to the parallel time and space of this...
-
Idella 2023-09-04 01:55:19
In fact, this is the one that is most faithful to the original work of Suzuki Koji, but for those who have not read the original work, it is likely to feel unintelligible. The 1999 "リング 2" is the third part, but it has nothing to do with the original work. If the third part of the original work is made into a movie, it is estimated that the cost is not small, and it is a large computer and a desert...
-
Mylene 2023-09-02 00:28:35
It's...
-
Suzanne 2023-08-29 06:15:59
pretty...
-
Abelardo 2023-08-23 09:19:30
Unscrupulous screenwriters All kinds of incest, infidelity, perverts, spoofs, pseudo-horror, pseudo-science fiction, all kinds of...
-
Joannie 2023-08-18 15:43:14
The plot that did not appear in the original work is the director's own story, which is much inferior to the first...
-
Nelda 2023-08-09 15:52:14
The worst...
-
Lisa 2023-08-06 01:35:49
This midnight bell is simply incomprehensible. A...
Spiral Comments
-
Angelo 2022-06-16 21:57:06
The suspense has greatly reduced the horror.
A biology movie involving science fiction doesn't feel interesting to me personally
I read the chronicle and found that this is very consistent with the original
The first time I watched it, I didn't understand the time relationship between the reappearance of the fierce bell and the entanglement of...
-
Opal 2022-10-07 03:54:36
It's actually a film about morals (this is not a film review)
This isn't a movie review, it's a personal opinion.
I'm very timid, so I basically don't watch horror movies. I watched this movie this time and found that it wasn't scary at all. I thought I was timid. In fact, the output of this film is not horror, but moral issues. It's about the ethical issues...
-
Mitsuo Ando: There is not a man in the world who would wish his own son dead.
Mai Takano: Dr Ando, Dr Takayama didn't want Yoichi to die. He wanted to save him... for Reiko.
-
Ryuji Takayama: You couldn't slit your wrists but you happily tore apart me!
