Shoah Comments

Pedro 2022-09-19 07:02:50

570MIN Restauré par Why Not Productions en 2012 4K, avec le soutien de la Fondation pour la Mémoire de la Shoah et du CNC. A propos de Shoah : Conversation avec Claude Lanzmann AVEC Serge Toubiana｜20150818/9BD Rewatch

Letitia 2022-09-18 16:48:21

scénatrio class. It's almost impossible to watch it all in 9...

Stuart 2022-09-12 12:15:48

Can't see. For a real movie that is objective to the extreme, the director is reluctant to show his attitude at...

Trevion 2022-08-21 14:18:47

This time, I really watched it for nearly a week; I just started watching the first 2 hours as if I felt okay, and I wondered if it was because it was not of the same ethnic group. But the more I look back, the heavier I am, so that when I really understand what I am looking at, the language can no longer bear this weight, and people can only be aphasia in the face of such history. 9 hours is still too...

Celine 2022-08-20 22:29:29

Ebert pretends to call the movie Fact, but this is not a fact, there is no fact to talk about, let alone a reshaping. These interviews are statements of memories, at most testimonies. The screen constantly scans the modern appearance of the concentration camp sites and survivor towns/cities from all angles and times (seasons). Lanzman is actually using this 9-hour documentary to measure the distance between the massacre and reality. Therefore, the film is valuable as the film itself. The energy...

Carmine 2022-08-20 22:07:26

N/A Speechless... The long song is crying, but in fact it is in the name of indescribable things with memories and evidence. That is, as Langzman said, "Shoah" is a meaningless title, because the most extreme horror cannot be quantified by a term. And the seemingly long nine-and-a-half hours slid quickly through each individual's straightforward and profound effort to approach (rather than touch) death step by step. It's like a blade slashing across the...

Taya 2022-08-20 20:41:41

When one day, images become flooded, empty, and frivolous, and people no longer believe in images, then how do we explore the truth and capture the truth? Lanzman did not try to reproduce the atrocities frivolously and compulsively, nor did he arouse people's superficial empathy with a priori knowledge; he carefully approached history, touched history, entered history and reproduced it in a semi-fictional manner. History, he used patience and courage to collect the real burned embers, those...

Anais 2022-08-20 19:57:58

8/10. [Hao catastrophe] is magically established in the ambiguity of the past and the present. The sound and picture relationship combines the beautiful scenery and the horrible roar of the train, in the ruins covered by weeds and snow, through the gestures of the dictator, a smile and a smile. The repetition of language, anxiety, and crying all stimulate the imagination of the audience. The material traces removed by time are resurrected in the memory of words. The executioners concealed in...

Krista 2022-08-20 19:56:15

Top: Misery did not become the main theme. The impact of the Jews’ encounters on later generations. The survivors who did evil or stood on the sidelines. The sarcasm and grinning survivors patted their shoulders and questioned the residents who occupied the Jewish houses. The Germans from the TV’s perspective, acting politely. The Jews who were deceived and delighted, the guns were still pointed at the Jews, the group portrait interviewing Jesus' revenge was mixed. Bottom: In reality, there is...