-
Claudine 2021-12-11 08:01:36
Weakness of human nature... When I was young, I always thought that the jury system is the most just system. A group of people is more difficult to control than one person. However, a group of weak people is like a scorpion and a big tree compared to a person of iron. Justice comes from freedom, and true freedom only exists in the mind and will of the individual. Be a free man. Look again and find that JC's lower eyeliner is really...
-
Coby 2021-12-11 08:01:36
It's another documentary film. . . Under the repeated recommendation of the administrative law teacher. . . I saw it as a law student and felt that the jury consulting company in this film was out of control and not decent. They deserved to lose the lawsuit in the end! But it is true that there is no way for them to live on...
-
Laurine 2021-12-11 08:01:36
The last turning point is really not exciting enough, I thought it was so awesome, it turned out to be boring revenge. But the previous foreshadowing is still good, with a strong sense of hierarchy, leading the audience all the way. It is very suitable for Cusack to play this kind of wise general. Old Hoffman has too few...
-
Garry 2021-12-11 08:01:36
The big-name Biao drama, the front is too long, the cute uncle John Cusack, and Rachel are really good, the ending is actually sensational. But to watch JB, even with soy sauce, show a charming smile. Gene Hackman plays the hero's father in Split...
-
Jaeden 2021-12-11 08:01:36
When Americans reflect on the extent of the loopholes in the jury system, the Chinese are still wondering why even public trials cannot be...
-
Elizabeth 2021-12-11 08:01:36
I thought it was a court debate, but after watching it, I discovered that the content of the trial was just the background. What I really want to talk about is the jury system. As long as there is a system, there will be auxiliary industries for this system and all kinds of people who want to take advantage of this system. There is really a demand and a supply. Some places are too hot, but there is no pleasure of fighting wits and reversal. It's still good domestically, so there is no need to...
-
Horacio 2021-12-11 08:01:36
The middle process is very tight. Part of the film’s success is to reveal the purpose of the two people at the end. The director is not without a political purpose. Eliminating the portrayal of the villain, the film itself is still very exciting. The villain's lawyer is innocent. As he said, his job is to win the lawsuit. Considering too many ethical factors, instead of being a good lawyer. Why did good lawyers end up spending no...
-
Logan 2021-12-11 08:01:36
Watching a good story be filmed into this shit is really disturbing. Compared to the crappy lawyer played by Hackman DH, who can't speak in the court, I can't lift the lung capacity enough and I don't pay attention to the logical stress. I am also shocked. The star is completely sensitive to Cusack’s sweet and sensitive kind,...
-
Reymundo 2021-12-11 08:01:36
The story of the little villain who killed the teacher and father. The soldier finally broke things. The so-called not to live is to refuse. The people are always on the wall, but the jury system is still a great...
-
Destin 2021-12-11 08:01:36
Dustin Hoffman, John Cusack and Rachel Vichy, I might be tempted to have one of these three, let alone all three together! Legal movies, but not based on court debates, but manipulating all kinds of wits and courage by the jury; it is also an old drama in which the common people have won the power. Although it is too idealistic, it is difficult to happen, but it is a movie....
Runaway Jury Comments
-
Nicholas Easter: Goodbye, Fitch.
Rankin Fitch: Well, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait... How did you swing 'em, huh? How did you swing 'em your way? I hear you got ten votes. How'd you do that?
Nicholas Easter: [shrugs] I didn't swing anything. I just stopped you from stealing the thing. We let 'em vote their hearts. That means you lose. Enjoy your drink.
-
Wendell Rohr: Is that why you're doing this? To protect the constitution, is that it?
Rankin Fitch: Of course not. I'm in it to win.
Wendell Rohr: Oh.
Rankin Fitch: Just like you are.
Wendell Rohr: Yeah.
Rankin Fitch: Because that's what I was hired to do.
Wendell Rohr: Uh huh.
Rankin Fitch: Everything else is colored bubbles.
Wendell Rohr: Colored bubbles! Colored bubbles? A system that calls for twelve people to sit and listen to testimony of witnesses, fella, and that includes my witness, who you've disappeared!
Rankin Fitch: If you're relying on testimony to win this case, you've already lost it.