-
Tyshawn 2022-03-22 09:01:52
7.0/10 points. 2018.12.14, Rewatch, European Blu-ray. There are a few logical flaws, but the actors' performances are brilliant. . . Gene Hackman is particularly good at playing those extremely powerful old white men. ....
-
Reagan 2021-12-11 08:01:36
Many plots are not spread out, the characterization is not full, and a lot of big names are wasted. In the beginning, in order to create suspense effects, many plots were unbelievable. For example, in the candle shop, it was okay to play like this; I also discussed with two friends how to evade the duty of jury. Those two friends came and went without a trace. Is there such a control over the jury? Am I too optimistic or is the author persecuting delusion? New Orleans is so beautiful, more...
-
Patricia 2021-12-11 08:01:36
Very entangled: watching this film is an unparalleled enjoyment; after watching the film, I found that I had watched a good film and missed a good film that I hadn't watched,...
-
Garrick 2021-12-11 08:01:36
Looking at the old movies, the impression is mediocre. Still the original novel is wonderful. If you put aside the shooting now, the end of the world will begin after the trial. After all, arms companies are not vegetarian, and killing someone is not a problem at all. The past and relatives of these two people are all exposed, how far can they escape? So the ending should be changed to: the defense is successful, but the righteous are killed one by one, because this is the...
-
Julio 2021-12-11 08:01:36
I have to calm down and look at it. Teaching film on international business law. If you want to look at the beautiful Cusack, you will be very satisfied. If you want to see the big-nosed graduate, it is probably my illusion. I always feel that he has made a super soy...
-
Brett 2021-12-11 08:01:36
I don’t like this movie at all. Although I think it’s wrong to buy guns at will, but since the country is to buy and sell guns legally, the company that makes guns is sentenced to indemnity because someone kills someone with a gun. I think it’s good or unfair to the company. , Which is equivalent to that we can’t buy knives at any time and kill people, but the company that produces the knives pays. I think the court should rule that the company that makes guns loses the lawsuit, but not for...
-
Guadalupe 2021-12-11 08:01:36
i hate every happy ending! Although the process is still very...
-
Nikita 2021-12-11 08:01:36
Reflects the essence of many common law systems, such as the jury system; the precedent system, etc. With these support, the plot development is more convincing, and the film is more watchable. In addition, John Cusack's role in planning is confident and confident The calmness in the face of danger led to the dramatic turn of the film's ending. Although a bit heroic, I have to think of the eloquent juror No. 8 in "Twelve Slaves" who advocated "reasonable...
-
Retta 2021-12-11 08:01:36
In order to meet the standards of American commercial films, plots such as killer burglary and house burning are added to the film, which greatly downplays the purity of a legal film, but the whole film is still intense and exciting, with suspense, especially Hoff. Man, although there are not many scenes, the demeanor of a civil rights lawyer is on the screen, which is awe-inspiring. This is the best introductory film to understand the American criminal legal system, especially the jury system....
-
Emelie 2021-12-11 08:01:36
Halfway through, the debate between Hoffman and Rankin in the toilet was really...
Runaway Jury Comments
-
Nicholas Easter: Goodbye, Fitch.
Rankin Fitch: Well, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait... How did you swing 'em, huh? How did you swing 'em your way? I hear you got ten votes. How'd you do that?
Nicholas Easter: [shrugs] I didn't swing anything. I just stopped you from stealing the thing. We let 'em vote their hearts. That means you lose. Enjoy your drink.
-
Wendell Rohr: Is that why you're doing this? To protect the constitution, is that it?
Rankin Fitch: Of course not. I'm in it to win.
Wendell Rohr: Oh.
Rankin Fitch: Just like you are.
Wendell Rohr: Yeah.
Rankin Fitch: Because that's what I was hired to do.
Wendell Rohr: Uh huh.
Rankin Fitch: Everything else is colored bubbles.
Wendell Rohr: Colored bubbles! Colored bubbles? A system that calls for twelve people to sit and listen to testimony of witnesses, fella, and that includes my witness, who you've disappeared!
Rankin Fitch: If you're relying on testimony to win this case, you've already lost it.