-
Domenica 2023-08-21 00:45:03
A glimpse into the mystery of the jury system. Foreplay is too technical and doesn't go well with a human...
-
Adrain 2022-04-24 07:01:07
The idealized ending feels slightly out of touch with the previous...
-
Dedric 2022-04-24 07:01:07
The second film I watched without boredom in Zhuhai Tibet...
-
Keven 2022-04-24 07:01:07
Great plot, Cusack and Rachel are...
-
Cyril 2022-04-24 07:01:07
Take a look at the main theme movie made by others. It just ends up being a bit...
-
Cyrus 2022-04-24 07:01:07
The darkness and light of America's judicial system all come together in this film...a heartwarming trial...a delightful...
-
Bennett 2022-04-24 07:01:07
The story is good, but I feel unmoved. Both the plaintiff and the defendant are lacking in the battle of wits and the appeal of the...
-
Nico 2022-04-24 07:01:07
Lie-in-deception mode, the actors perform well, the case is ups and downs, and the editing is...
-
Sincere 2022-04-24 07:01:07
Dustin Hoffman and Gene Hackman are classmates and roommates who were both mocked as the most unpromising actors, and I'm curious that the person who said this saw the two accomplished acting masters in the How do you feel in the bottom of your heart when you are acting freely in this...
-
Darian 2022-04-24 07:01:07
Can only two good guys win? ? ? On the opposite side are the lawyers and arms dealers who have worked for many years. . . The movie is really...
Runaway Jury Comments
-
Electa 2022-03-22 09:01:52
Runaway Jury
A firearms company was sued for a gun case. Both the prosecution and the defense, as well as a mysterious third party, sent their superiors to screen, select, win, and control jurors.
"The Jury Behind the Scenes" tells a very wonderful story, showing the jury system of the Anglo-American legal... -
Halle 2021-12-11 08:01:36
Out of control in the second half
It belongs to the movie with reduced stars, three and a half are good. An hour before the film is an introductory textbook to the American jury system. Among them, Keene Hackman’s Holmes-style detailed observation deduction method, his position comparable to the mini-CIA’s jury candidate...
-
Nicholas Easter: Goodbye, Fitch.
Rankin Fitch: Well, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait... How did you swing 'em, huh? How did you swing 'em your way? I hear you got ten votes. How'd you do that?
Nicholas Easter: [shrugs] I didn't swing anything. I just stopped you from stealing the thing. We let 'em vote their hearts. That means you lose. Enjoy your drink.
-
Wendell Rohr: Is that why you're doing this? To protect the constitution, is that it?
Rankin Fitch: Of course not. I'm in it to win.
Wendell Rohr: Oh.
Rankin Fitch: Just like you are.
Wendell Rohr: Yeah.
Rankin Fitch: Because that's what I was hired to do.
Wendell Rohr: Uh huh.
Rankin Fitch: Everything else is colored bubbles.
Wendell Rohr: Colored bubbles! Colored bubbles? A system that calls for twelve people to sit and listen to testimony of witnesses, fella, and that includes my witness, who you've disappeared!
Rankin Fitch: If you're relying on testimony to win this case, you've already lost it.
