-
Ivy 2022-03-26 09:01:10
The courtroom scene is not intense enough, and the conflict in the plot is not strong enough. The film ends when the male protagonist finds the hammer, zooms out the camera, and looks back. This can be an open ending. The previous performances have been excellent and very...
-
Cordelia 2022-03-26 09:01:10
Another Ellen Pakula + Gordon Willis classic, the director's old-fashioned way, the courtroom drama is wonderful, one link is linked, the relationship between the characters is intricate but the performance is concise and clear, and it has been misleading the audience since the title. , the ending is powerful but can't stand careful scrutiny (it's obvious that the police searched the...
-
Gia 2022-03-26 09:01:10
The script structure is excellent, and it can be regarded as a classic of court...
-
Cleta 2022-03-26 09:01:10
Wife with high IQ, criminal or something~ I am a royal sister-in-law. ....
-
Norberto 2022-03-26 09:01:10
Guess the truth by seeing a quarter of it. The implication is actually so obvious that even the final confession is...
-
Einar 2022-03-25 09:01:14
The wonderful thing about the film is that: one of the movies has been using the first-person self-deprecating tone to advance the plot, neither admitting nor shirking, letting the audience navigate the suspense of whether the murderer is the protagonist; second, the reversal of the wife, from being betrayed. From losing confidence in life to picking up the courage to apply for a university position, the image of grasping the psychological path of her husband and the case is vivid. What should...
-
Carmine 2022-03-25 09:01:14
It seems that I saw it in the Sixth Princess when I was very young. The final reversal was impressive, and the court scene was also shot beautifully, but the explanation of the murderer at the end was superfluous. The moment the murder weapon is found, the movie should end. PS. Conclusion after watching this and The Undoing: Is it okay to dispose of the murder weapon first after killing someone? What kind of shit is it to bring the murder weapon home?...
-
Colton 2022-03-25 09:01:14
First time knowing...
-
Demario 2022-03-25 09:01:14
The music is great! It turns out that "Criminal Investigation File" uses the theme music of this movie made by John Williams, which is super tangled, super suspenseful, and super...
-
Kaya 2022-03-25 09:01:14
Harrison Ford's films are so...
Presumed Innocent Comments
-
Julien 2022-02-15 08:02:27
Why do you want to blame your husband?
I don't think the ending is surprising, because the film has repeatedly shown some information about the actor's wife, which means that the case must be related to her, otherwise the scenes of her masturbation at home are not necessary at all. A woman who is confused about her own value and the...
-
Cory 2022-02-15 08:02:27
Compilation of teaching materials for innocent sinners
The director created 192 pages of homicide tracing blocked. The murderer admits that the case is clear. The first code plot narrative always points to the narrative phrase: uniquely ordered the assistant to stop checking the phone and record the fingerprints on the wine glass. Vagina semen. Ford is...
-
Rusty Sabich: Sandy, how did you know what was behind Larren's fear of the B File?
Sandy Stern: Ahh, you question the judge's integrity?
Rusty Sabich: With good reason, wouldn't you say? You knew that file didn't have a damn thing to do with my case and yet you let Larren know you'd drag it in at any opportunity. That it would come out he was taking bribes. That Carolyn was the courier. You blackmailed him, Sandy.
Sandy Stern: We speak now, tonight, and then these things are never spoken of again, agreed? Larren's divorce left him in a state of disorder. He was drinking much too heavily and he fell into a relationship with a beautiful, but uh, self-serving woman. The fact is, Larren grew suicidally depressed. He wanted to resign his post. Raymond Horgan talked him out of it.
Rusty Sabich: Raymond knew he was taking bribes?
Sandy Stern: Larren told him. Raymond cleaned up the North side and he also rescued a distinguished mind and career that does honor to the bench. I believe Larren today did what he thought was just. You tell me, Rusty. Was justice done?
-
Sandy Stern: Your honor, before we begin our presentation, I would like to make a motion...
Judge Larren Lyttle: Make a motion for dismissal?
Sandy Stern: Yes, your honor.
Judge Larren Lyttle: Sit down, counselor. I have reflected on this case at great lengths, ladies and gentlemen. Now I understand the prosecutors have suspicions. Perhaps Mr. Sabbich was there that night. They might be entitled to that inference. And before yesterday, I might have even said that there were reasonable grounds for those suspicions. Now, I'm not so sure. After yesterday, there is no proof of motive here. There is no evidence that there ever was an intimate relationship between the defendant and Ms. Polhemus. There is no proof so far as I am concerned to give a reasonable person grounds to believe that they had carnal relations on the night of her death. In point of fact, there's not one shred of direct proof that Mr. Sabbich murdered Ms. Polhemus. So under these circumstances, I cannot allow this trial to continue. Mr. Sabbich, you are discharged, sir. And I cannot begin to tell you how sorry I am that any of this has taken place. Not even the pleasure of seeing you free can make up for this, this disgrace to the cause of justice. I wish you Godspeed. Case dismissed.
