-
Kaleigh 2022-04-22 07:01:42
childhood. Later, I read the original novel and found that at least the movie was better than the...
-
Estefania 2022-04-22 07:01:42
The law is not necessarily a good thing, a good court film, with some suspenseful elements, the screenwriter is good at foreshadowing the...
-
Parker 2022-04-22 07:01:42
The lawyer hired by the male protagonist at a high price is really...
-
Alexys 2022-04-21 09:02:55
It was purely a fluke that I didn't go in, and the scenes were all outside the courtroom. It was actually talking about the chaos in the judicial and police circles in the United States. The courtroom could be bribed, and the key evidence could be taken at will, which is not as good as...
-
Deontae 2022-04-21 09:02:55
It scared me to death, I thought it was a court movie, and I sucked a bear. It turned out to be classified as a...
-
Edgardo 2022-04-21 09:02:55
After 40 minutes of watching, I wanted to know who played Carolyn Polhemus, and when I clicked on the page, I glanced at a 20-word spoiler comment... Too...
-
Rodrigo 2022-04-21 09:02:55
What if it ended when Rusty found the bloody murder weapon in the house and cleaned it...
-
Jordy 2022-04-21 09:02:55
First, I read the original book, but I couldn't read it and turned two pages, so I stopped repeating it for several days! Finally decided to watch the movie first... The pacing of the good movie is well controlled, but the whole story comes down to the feeling that everyone has a story and their own dark...
-
Syble 2022-04-21 09:02:55
Books are ten thousand times better than movies. Only for Samsung because the ending was ruined. The ending in the movie is Rusty's guess about his wife in the book; but this reasoning is loose. When he was discussing glass fingerprints with a police friend, the police deduced that his wife had deliberately framed him and she wanted to kill him; Rusty was found not guilty by accident. This reasoning is more logical, because otherwise, why have fingerprints and sperm? How to explain...
-
Carmel 2022-04-21 09:02:55
As with Simpson's wife murder, the trial was ruined by a slew of evidence and, of course, the fact that the judge was corrupt. The reversal does not feel very strong, maybe the whole film is a depressing atmosphere. What makes this film great is its tight plot, great trial, and, at the end, a specious dark humor -- not really humor at all. Harrison Ford's slightly hesitant expression showed the entanglement of an introverted and repressed person. In the end, the wife rambled about herself,...
Presumed Innocent Comments
-
Nico Della Guardia: We would like Mr. Molto to take the stand.
Judge Larren Lyttle: [angrily] NO!
Nico Della Guardia: Judge, you said that we'd be given leeway if the Defense proceeded with this frame-up theory. You said that!
Judge Larren Lyttle: Yes! But I did NOT know then that the State's chief piece of evidence was going to disappear after last being seen with Mr. Molto. I did not know THEN that the Deputy Prosecutor and the Chief Pathologist were going to *manufacture* evidence and testimony! That, gentlemen, is a FAIR interpretation of today's events. I'm still struggling with what's going to happen to Mr. Molto, but what is NOT going to happen is him getting up on that witness stand and making things WORSE!
Tommy Molto: Your Honor, my testimony will...
Judge Larren Lyttle: WITHDRAW, GENTLEMEN!
[the lawyers step back]
Nico Della Guardia: On befalf of the People of Kindle County, the State rests.
-
Rusty Sabich: Next time you talk to him, tell him to call me so I can find out what's going on in my own *fucking* investigation. Painless, you tell Molto, and you tell Nico, too, that this is cheap, cheap politics. Cheap Police Department bullshit. God better help them and help you, too, if I can't make a case for tampering.
