-
Lexie 2022-02-15 08:02:27
2010.12.14 The most exciting court debate in the book and various unspeakable attempts are basically impossible to show in the movie.
-
Tamara 2022-02-15 08:02:27
If this kind of theme was taken reliably, it would have been...
-
Madyson 2022-02-15 08:02:27
This is a very mediocre film, with chaotic logic, and basically does not give a glorious introduction to American justice. I just remember two details: First, the prosecution and defense, as long as one party applies to speak with the judge at close range, the other party will definitely follow; second, the clerk in the U.S. court can be a 50 or 60-year-old lady. It seems that in our court, the clerks are all young boys or...
-
Levi 2022-02-15 08:02:27
Based on Scott Trow's novel of the same name, the Chinese translation of the name is very vivid, but it is slightly spoiled. The reversal at the end is the finishing touch. It has the most detailed and authentic court scenes in the current legal-themed films, which almost run through the entire film. Harrison Ford's look like in "Blade Runner" is eye-catching. But in this film, a completely different and uncool character is portrayed, which is hard to...
-
Hildegard 2022-02-15 08:02:27
After watching this movie, I came to the conclusion that the world is full of dog blood, and the court trial was very brilliant, especially for the defense's weakening of the expert witness testimony of the prosecutor's...
-
Aron 2022-02-15 08:02:27
In fact, we still look forward to seeing the injustice in the...
-
Carli 2022-02-15 08:02:27
Plato, what should we do, what should. we...
-
Raul 2022-02-15 08:02:27
Borrow this article that has more likes "shows the American judicial system and the unique value judgments of Americans, and tells everyone that if the evidence is unfounded (the truth is not clear), anyone who is doubtful is innocent. They They all still have the greatest right granted to citizens by the United States—freedom.” On the contrary, if the evidence is “available,” would it not be that the male protagonist will definitely be convicted—but he is innocent. (These are the two sides I...
-
Dane 2022-02-15 08:02:27
Guessed the end from the beginning, too much from the...
-
Melba 2022-02-15 08:02:27
What I see is that American law-the details of court debate-is fun. Better understand the purpose of the law to protect human freedom. emotion? There is nothing wrong with loving someone, and loving someone wrong may be a big...
Presumed Innocent Comments
-
Nico Della Guardia: We would like Mr. Molto to take the stand.
Judge Larren Lyttle: [angrily] NO!
Nico Della Guardia: Judge, you said that we'd be given leeway if the Defense proceeded with this frame-up theory. You said that!
Judge Larren Lyttle: Yes! But I did NOT know then that the State's chief piece of evidence was going to disappear after last being seen with Mr. Molto. I did not know THEN that the Deputy Prosecutor and the Chief Pathologist were going to *manufacture* evidence and testimony! That, gentlemen, is a FAIR interpretation of today's events. I'm still struggling with what's going to happen to Mr. Molto, but what is NOT going to happen is him getting up on that witness stand and making things WORSE!
Tommy Molto: Your Honor, my testimony will...
Judge Larren Lyttle: WITHDRAW, GENTLEMEN!
[the lawyers step back]
Nico Della Guardia: On befalf of the People of Kindle County, the State rests.
-
Rusty Sabich: Next time you talk to him, tell him to call me so I can find out what's going on in my own *fucking* investigation. Painless, you tell Molto, and you tell Nico, too, that this is cheap, cheap politics. Cheap Police Department bullshit. God better help them and help you, too, if I can't make a case for tampering.
