-
Green 2022-03-20 09:02:19
It is also an American-style story of the struggle between individuals and the government, but it did not exaggerate the individual but made a desperate tone. The ending is really unexpected. The plot and performance are used to catch people. The performance of the two female protagonists is really good; maybe in Heaven will never see such a movie in its...
-
Hoyt 2022-03-20 09:02:19
After being popularized by the First Amendment, "Freedom of the press refers to the exemption of prior restrictions on publication, rather than pointing out that the publication can still be exempt from punishment even if it involves criminal issues." Basically, it is my attitude towards Rachel's way of obtaining information, but The government's accountability measures are too extreme, so let's play 50 big...
-
Ansley 2022-03-20 09:02:19
There are many golden sentences: A man can live a good life, be honorable, give to charity, but in the end, the number of people who come to his funeral is generally dependent on the...
-
Delia 2022-03-20 09:02:19
1. "For truly amazing people, there is no difference between people and principles." 2. The film does not show the influence of "truth" on public opinion and state power, but focuses on reporters, the core It is the persistence of the reporter, the defense of one's own principles, the debate between personal rights and national interests, and truth and national...
-
Scot 2022-03-19 09:01:06
1 From the beginning of the concept of stealing to diverting attention and narrowing the horizon-what is "treason", who is "treason", "treason" or "treason". Many times we are hinted and told and believe in our subconscious default, we don't even spend a minute thinking about it. 2 It is enough for this film to be flat, and it is always full of strength to adhere to promises and...
-
Anne 2022-03-19 09:01:06
"A person may lead a good life, be respected, and be keen on charity, but in the end, the number of people who come to attend his funeral depends on the weather of the day"-I like this line very much. If you are not interested in American politics, watching this movie is a process of torturing yourself. Fortunately, the ending will make you wake up. You will more or less try to look at the problem from the standpoint of the heroine and understand her choice. Although this choice left her with...
-
Alphonso 2022-03-19 09:01:06
Before I saw the ending, I had the urge to give 5 stars. It not only involved the rights and obligations of the news media, but also saw the changes in everyone's life under the national security politics, without losing the realization of family and women's rights. I was very pleased to see this film on the 12th reporter's day. It's best to see the ending, and I want to give the movie 6 stars! The movie with a long ending gives a feeling of lingering sound. The world is complicated, it’s too...
-
Andy 2022-03-19 09:01:06
The pro-ion is scattered, and it's so easy to do it. In the end, the big BOSS and the little loli, you are really a pitfall. After all, national security is above the law is a rogue, and it's useless how you resist when a rogue is in power. There are many examples of the great dynasty raping freedom of speech, and no one dares to make it into a movie. "The people in power, regardless of party or faction, just want to make themselves immortal. The people are the ultimate victims." The ending is...
-
Stanford 2022-03-19 09:01:06
The ending! The ending! !...
-
Andreanne 2022-03-18 09:01:05
Seeing straight hair in my heart. How is this country like...
Nothing But the Truth Comments
-
Kim 2022-03-24 09:02:56
Debate over size
I wanted to write something from feminism when I heard Rachel say "men, women" blah blah in the middle, because, indeed, there are very few serious films like this that feature a female protagonist who is Extraordinarily tough. But when I saw the ending, I found that this has nothing to do with...
-
Enrico 2022-04-21 09:02:59
starfish
Maybe my IQ is too low, or the director and screenwriter didn't express clearly, and didn't understand whether Rachel finally gave up or not. Out of malice towards the world, I am willing to give a higher score if she does not confess to the informant, but to say that she really confessed in...
-
Ray Armstrong: [staring at his wife's new story] You made the top page!
-
Alan Burnside: [In front of the Supreme Court] In 1972 in Branzburg v. Hayes this Court ruled against the right of reporters to withhold the names of their sources before a grand jury, and it gave the power to the Government to imprison those reporters who did. It was a 5-4 decision, close. In his dissent in Branzburg, Justice Stewart said, 'As the years pass, power of Government becomes more and more pervasive. Those in power,' he said, 'whatever their politics, want only to perpetuate it, and the people are the victims.' Well, the years have passed, and that power is pervasive. Mrs. Armstrong could have buckled to the demands of the Government; she could've abandoned her promise of confidentiality; she could've simply gone home to her family. But to do so, would mean that no source would ever speak to her again, and no source would ever speak to her newspaper again. And then tomorrow when we lock up journalists from other newspapers we'll make those publications irrelevant as well, and thus we'll make the First Amendment irrelevant. And then how will we know if a President has covered up crimes or if an army officer has condoned torture? We as a nation will no longer be able to hold those in power accountable to those whom they have power over. And what then is the nature of Government when it has no fear of accountability? We should shudder at the thought. Imprisoning journalists? That's for other countries; that's for countries who fear their citizens - not countries that cherish and protect them. Some time ago, I began to feel the personal, human pressure on Rachel Armstrong and I told her that I was there to represent her and not her principle. And it was not until I met her that I realized that with great people there's no difference between principle and the person.
