-
Susie 2022-03-26 09:01:10
she's a traitor indeed.... those talks about professional ethics are ALL...
-
Alice 2022-03-26 09:01:10
I didn't really understand many places, and the focus was a little off track, so I felt that the media should really watch this movie. Speaking with facts, how difficult it is, you have to fight to the end. The indignation at the death of the CIA female agent is largely due to the love of the actor Vera Farmiga. The unexpected ending of the film is...
-
Jaeden 2022-03-26 09:01:10
Correct and practical principles are dialectical and contradictory, and the key depends on what you value. I am glad that I was born in China, not the United States, in this era, and I am also glad that I did not become a social news reporter in the end, because God wanted me to live...
-
Sofia 2022-03-26 09:01:10
Natural Born Killers is shocking enough. It is not a strange thing for cnn to be a thug. The story begins with a reporter stealing state secrets with a gossip mentality to win the Pulitzer, and the final confession is a kind of atonement. Since you're both right, it's the agent's own fault, and her daughter's even more so. Let’s be so entangled, anyway, without communism, there is no interest and human nature without...
-
Kole 2022-03-26 09:01:10
The truth of the last minute could not ignite the long foreshadowing of more than 100 minutes before, but it allowed me to once again witness the powerlessness of the law in the face of power. Ross's performance was quite satisfactory, which disappointed me a...
-
Sherwood 2022-03-26 09:01:10
A quiet and low-key narrative, but still brings some thought. Regarding the true mission of the law, whether a person has the right to judge another person, the importance of the truth lies in the interests behind it or in itself. The ending is a little unexpected. Beckinsale's performance is...
-
Lee 2022-03-26 09:01:10
Before I saw the ending, I had the urge to give 5 stars. It not only involves the rights and obligations of people in the news media, but also sees the changes in everyone's life under national security politics, while at the same time realizing the realization of family and women's rights. I was very relieved to see this film on the 12th Press Festival. It's best to give the movie 6 stars when you see the ending! The film with the long ending gives the impression of lingering voices. The world...
-
Eldora 2022-03-26 09:01:10
If there is no last scene, the film should be renamed to kill me and I won't say it, but the effect of the last scene is subversive. Originally, I only supported the government's decision, but I also support Rachel now, because I am a person. I won't...
-
Dolly 2022-03-26 09:01:10
people couldn't have fought thier government, even when they were holding the...
-
Shana 2022-03-25 09:01:15
Politics, policy, rights and power, ethics and principles. Such a deep topic is actually so catchy. Kate finally got rid of the...
Nothing But the Truth Comments
-
Trudie 2022-01-09 08:02:04
Truth comes first
When morality is in conflict with the law, how would you choose? what should you do? Do you choose to respect your inner moral system and persevere without hesitation; or as a whole person, uphold the sanctity of national laws? The end of the film is very helpless, and it adds to the audience's...
-
Jaylen 2022-03-23 09:02:44
It would be too exhausting to discuss a movie without a forum.
Absolutely good film, the role of the acting school is to attract people to watch the seemingly bland content attentively. There are a lot of good lines in the film, which are written for those who stick to their beliefs or insist on being correct. In one sentence, the film critic said that the...
-
Ray Armstrong: [staring at his wife's new story] You made the top page!
-
Alan Burnside: [In front of the Supreme Court] In 1972 in Branzburg v. Hayes this Court ruled against the right of reporters to withhold the names of their sources before a grand jury, and it gave the power to the Government to imprison those reporters who did. It was a 5-4 decision, close. In his dissent in Branzburg, Justice Stewart said, 'As the years pass, power of Government becomes more and more pervasive. Those in power,' he said, 'whatever their politics, want only to perpetuate it, and the people are the victims.' Well, the years have passed, and that power is pervasive. Mrs. Armstrong could have buckled to the demands of the Government; she could've abandoned her promise of confidentiality; she could've simply gone home to her family. But to do so, would mean that no source would ever speak to her again, and no source would ever speak to her newspaper again. And then tomorrow when we lock up journalists from other newspapers we'll make those publications irrelevant as well, and thus we'll make the First Amendment irrelevant. And then how will we know if a President has covered up crimes or if an army officer has condoned torture? We as a nation will no longer be able to hold those in power accountable to those whom they have power over. And what then is the nature of Government when it has no fear of accountability? We should shudder at the thought. Imprisoning journalists? That's for other countries; that's for countries who fear their citizens - not countries that cherish and protect them. Some time ago, I began to feel the personal, human pressure on Rachel Armstrong and I told her that I was there to represent her and not her principle. And it was not until I met her that I realized that with great people there's no difference between principle and the person.
