-
Eduardo 2022-03-27 09:01:14
admire those who stick to principles and choose to do the right thing even it's a lot...
-
Marguerite 2022-03-27 09:01:14
Seeing all kinds of distressed Kate. However, the final paragraph shakes the previously constructed thinking a bit. All in all, this is the strongest performance I've seen so...
-
Silas 2022-03-27 09:01:14
This kind of adherence to the principle is not understood by the family, which is the most distressing. The last few turns of Rachel, Timmy's receding back made it sad. Is it worth the three years of prison for one person and two families? Fortunately, Mr. Lawyer and the colleagues of the newspaper are still...
-
Bobby 2022-03-27 09:01:14
Vera Farmiga is...
-
Hermina 2022-03-27 09:01:14
The beauty finally got rid of the title of vase. Both women acted quite well. It was a rare scene for a female lead singer. Although it was easy for the informer to guess, the ending was handled very well and very...
-
Frank 2022-03-27 09:01:14
Although I guessed the ending at the beginning and lost the chance to be enlightened at the end, it is not just the ending, this is a good work that can make people think for a long time. The power of the system is that even if you are righteous, challenge means...
-
Solon 2022-03-27 09:01:14
The main line is a story about a female reporter who refused to explain the CIA informant, was detained and fought all the time, but the content is actually quite rich. The reason why the heroine chooses to remain silent is that the first layer is the professional ethics of the reporter, and the second layer is the citizen. Self-confidence, the third layer is to face the ethical issues of the daughter of the deceased, the layers are peeled off, and the structure is also very clear. In this...
-
Jayne 2022-03-27 09:01:14
fuck the government! fuck the people! fuck fuck...
-
Katelyn 2022-03-27 09:01:14
The struggle between national security and the First Amendment, the struggle between politics and the law, women's rights, public opinion monitoring, media independence, how to continue to uphold their principles in a lone battle that is no longer supported by family and...
-
Pink 2022-03-27 09:01:14
Unexpected ending. But nasty Rachel husband David Schwimmer (ROSS) is also in...
Nothing But the Truth Comments
-
Will 2022-03-24 09:02:56
The courage to reveal the truth, but also the courage to bear the consequences.
What are you looking for as a journalist? Expose the truth? If achieving the goal will eventually lead to the collapse of the entire credibility, is it worth pursuing the truth? It's like the Red Cross has little credibility these days, even because of an irrelevant person.
The reason why the... -
Immanuel 2022-03-25 09:01:15
"Truth Matters" super 140-word film review
Soldiers, politicians, journalists, lawyers are the most sensitive creatures in the world (up? Down?). When you concentrate and use the soil to exert your talents, a sensitive duel that is superior to others is very beautiful. Silent foreshadowing, swift moves, fatal killings. Not overwhelming, but...
-
Ray Armstrong: [staring at his wife's new story] You made the top page!
-
Alan Burnside: [In front of the Supreme Court] In 1972 in Branzburg v. Hayes this Court ruled against the right of reporters to withhold the names of their sources before a grand jury, and it gave the power to the Government to imprison those reporters who did. It was a 5-4 decision, close. In his dissent in Branzburg, Justice Stewart said, 'As the years pass, power of Government becomes more and more pervasive. Those in power,' he said, 'whatever their politics, want only to perpetuate it, and the people are the victims.' Well, the years have passed, and that power is pervasive. Mrs. Armstrong could have buckled to the demands of the Government; she could've abandoned her promise of confidentiality; she could've simply gone home to her family. But to do so, would mean that no source would ever speak to her again, and no source would ever speak to her newspaper again. And then tomorrow when we lock up journalists from other newspapers we'll make those publications irrelevant as well, and thus we'll make the First Amendment irrelevant. And then how will we know if a President has covered up crimes or if an army officer has condoned torture? We as a nation will no longer be able to hold those in power accountable to those whom they have power over. And what then is the nature of Government when it has no fear of accountability? We should shudder at the thought. Imprisoning journalists? That's for other countries; that's for countries who fear their citizens - not countries that cherish and protect them. Some time ago, I began to feel the personal, human pressure on Rachel Armstrong and I told her that I was there to represent her and not her principle. And it was not until I met her that I realized that with great people there's no difference between principle and the person.
