Midway Comments

Pamela 2022-03-26 09:01:09

The Battle of Midway was one of the few battles of World War II that qualifies as the "Battle of Destiny." Both sides tried their best, regardless of sacrifice, steel, courage and luck converged into the final decisive battle of fate. The U.S. Naval Air Force's dive bombers bombing the Japanese aircraft carrier one after another is the best war scene I haven't seen on the screen in a long time. It may be steel and technology that determine the outcome of a battle, courage and luck are the...

Clifford 2022-03-26 09:01:09

Can't compare to the classic "Tiger! Tiger! Tiger! , but much better than Pearl Harbor, which sold copies. Hollywood hasn't had a decent war movie for a long time, and "Hacksaw Ridge" and "Fury" are actually not complete war movies. The biggest advantage of this film: duty! There are all the things that war movies should have, but there is nothing like soul-stirring love that should not be there. It took an hour to explain the meaning and value of the Battle of Midway, connecting the background...

Charlotte 2022-03-26 09:01:09

"Every battle needs a miracle" The sea is...

Simeon 2022-03-26 09:01:09

Damn, the comments of some film critics really make people want to scold people. Would you like to have a face? Do you really understand how movies are made? In this day and age in Hollywood, who would dare to spend more than 100 million US dollars to make a film that cannot have a sequel? How many times did Roland go to China to sell the film for the money? People really restore history. You said it was PPT and cheap CG special effects. You said Roland Emmerich was cheap special effects? ?...

Stefanie 2022-03-26 09:01:09

Still good, although the main...

Valentina 2022-03-25 09:01:14

It was especially unexpected to see Doolittle's action in this film. Although it did not hit any important facilities, its practical significance was far greater than its actual significance. Luke Evans looks...

Jason 2022-03-25 09:01:14

Roland Emmerich's ability to shoot war scenes is still there, but the shooting consciousness has been unable to keep up with the progress of technology (technology has not substantially changed). The fundamental problem lies in the script. The constantly introduced characters do not come and disappear in an instant, and the characters are portrayed in a sloppy manner. In addition to the gradual progress of events on the timeline, they are basically waiting for important nodes to start...

Chasity 2022-03-25 09:01:14

Watch the History of Film Studies series. Sequel to Pearl Harbor. There are not so many emotional lines, and more attention is paid to the restoration of events. Great scenes are fun. If it weren't for these brave warriors who have come back to death, perhaps we would all have to speak Japanese...

Benny 2022-03-25 09:01:14

It is very worthy of affirmation that the Japanese side is not portrayed as a face, and on the basis of the main theme, the opponent is still portrayed richly and delicately. In such a huge battle, it is necessary to clarify the strategic plans of all parties, take into account different roles, and touch people's hearts. It is a test of the screenwriter's skills. I think this aspect is well done. The graphics, actors, and pacing are all good. The confrontation scenes are very exciting and...

Horace 2022-03-25 09:01:14

The overall texture of the giant screen of the times is not bad, the special effects are added, and the authenticity is reasonable (the US fighter jets are actually absent, only the Fearless War Zero), the plot is not bloody, but the image of the generals does not feel as good as the old...