-
Kieran 2021-11-27 08:01:17
The plot has old-fashioned bridge lines. The lines are too long. The director’s skills are still OK. I heard that it is a debut...
-
Teagan 2021-11-27 08:01:17
Personally think this video is...
-
Camylle 2021-11-27 08:01:17
Look at the...
-
Justus 2021-11-27 08:01:17
There is a middle-aged crisis...
-
Keagan 2021-11-27 08:01:17
The director’s debut is so great, it’s really good, the shooting technique is also worth learning, and many details are worth pondering over and over...
-
Pearlie 2021-11-27 08:01:17
It's difficult to follow into the drama, and may not be suitable for this kind of plot, but the concept is worth pondering, human...
-
Orpha 2021-11-27 08:01:17
I heard that it is the director’s debut work. It is actually quite attractive to read the introduction, but after reading it, I feel that the content is a bit weaker, and there is not much...
-
Carrie 2021-11-27 08:01:17
The hero, uh... the plot is not very...
-
Alexandria 2021-11-27 08:01:17
As a director's debut, it is indeed quite amazing. Perhaps the story is not brilliant, but the narrative method is really appetizing. And Clayton's character image is becoming more and more three-dimensional as the plot develops, and many details are also worth digging deeper. The actors are brilliant, as well as the old Pollack....
-
Lois 2021-11-27 08:01:17
The dog hurriedly jumped over the wall, the rabbit hurriedly kicked the eagle. If you don't force it, you can force it to shake the...
Michael Clayton Comments
-
Casimer 2022-03-21 09:01:46
take all or cheat all
I spent an evening and dinner watching Michael Crichton, it's full of scalp-tingling details, and it's even become a system that's hard to tear apart, and it's not easy to jump out of the loopholes in the story. . Law, murder, coincidence, responsibility, blackness, urbanity, all sorts of things...
-
Brett 2022-03-14 14:12:23
Insert clips to deal with multi-character appearances and multi-narrative viewpoint world-building challenges
From the large number of descriptive sentences in the script, it can be seen that the director is very patient in building a real world. There is a loose, illogical fragment inserted at the beginning of the film for fifteen minutes, which actually solves the problem of the characters appearing on...
-
Michael Clayton: What if Arthur was onto something?
Marty Bach: What do you mean? Onto what?
Michael Clayton: U North. What if he wasn't crazy, what if he was right?
Marty Bach: Right about what? We're on the wrong side?
Michael Clayton: Wrong side, wrong way. Anything. All of it.
Marty Bach: This is news? This case reeked from day one. Fifteen years in I gotta tell you how we pay the rent?
Michael Clayton: But what would they do, what would they do if he went public?
Marty Bach: What would they do? Are you fucking soft? They're doing it! We don't straighten this settlement out in the next twenty four hours, they're gonna withhold nine million dollars in fees. Then they're gonna pull out the video of Arthur doing his flashdance in Milwaukee, they're gonna sue us for legal malpractice. Except there won't be anything for them to win, because by then the merger with London will be dead and we'll be selling off the goddamn furniture!
[hands Michael an envelope]
Marty Bach: That's eighty. We're calling it a bonus. You've got a three year contract, that's your current numbers, that's assuming this all works out.
-
Michael Clayton: What can I tell you? Don't piss off a motivated stripper.
