-
Deja 2022-04-03 09:01:12
It snows again in Auschwitz, and the spring is approaching, the snow dripping water can't dispel the mourning for the dead. The meaning of the denial case is to let the light of reason melt the indifferent snow. The lawyer boyfriend who got up from the bed complained about being tired of the Holocaust. Letting the past go is not forgetting it, let alone being slandered. The trial is not for healing, but for the dignity and maximum consolation of the survivors. Your arm is not coded, you will...
-
Vicenta 2022-04-03 09:01:12
First of all, it's true that in the early 1900s, a British idiot historian denied that the Holocaust happened, and took the opponent who pointed out that he was a "Holocaust denier" to court, and it was decided whether the Holocaust happened. A court decision; it's ridiculous, but it happened in the early 2000s; if a person really believes what he thinks, and expresses those views, should it be upheld? In this case, the answer is...
-
Taya 2022-04-03 09:01:12
One more star is given because of the subject matter. The cruelty and ignorance of human beings are close at hand, and we must not forget that there is a meaning of the movie...
-
Anya 2022-04-03 08:01:01
The plot is flat just because of respect for real people. Watching this film after the US election is particularly emotional - we will always encounter bully in our life, they are arrogant and intolerant, full of lies, but they can always gain power. What we have to do is not to be frustrated or angry, but to do our own thing silently. What the heroine did best was to never say a word in court: she gave the job to a lawyer. The old, middle and young lawyers led by Mo Niang are...
-
Devonte 2022-04-03 08:01:01
The cast is strong, and Timothy Spall supported the audience; the book was weak, trying to deepen the denial's backlash, but unfortunately it didn't play out; the director's technique was quite satisfactory and lacked new ideas. It's a politically correct popcorn...
-
Beau 2022-04-03 08:01:01
The subject matter is good, but David Hare screwed up a bit this time. The narration is straightforward and has no skills, the character interpretation is relatively bland, and the heroine's inner and personality creation is relatively unsuccessful. It may be better to adapt it into a stage play or mini-series. Auschwitz is the...
-
D'angelo 2022-04-03 08:01:01
It's a good movie, the actors' pictures are acceptable, but the plot is a bit flat. I thought I would explore more about the stories behind the people who deny historical events and the truth behind the history, but unfortunately, it's superficial, and it is the first point of view. The heroine's character is also superficial. In the end, this film just stays as a good theme...
-
Tremaine 2022-04-03 08:01:01
Although the lines are dense and lengthy, in fact, I don't feel that the rhythm is dragged and the emotions are very concentrated. Tim Spall is worthy of the best actor in Cannes. For this role, he is very thin and plays the arrogant, extreme and cunning borderline personality perfectly. It's a pleasure to see Andrew Scott on the big screen. Although he always plays supporting roles, I still think his acting is very good, with skills and less...
-
Monroe 2022-04-03 08:01:01
Blind to the poster face, I saw the feature film and realized it wasn't Keira Knightley! The story itself is relatively small, and the female protagonist has a low sense of presence. Everyone performed in a balanced manner, which is a good group...
-
Violette 2022-04-03 08:01:01
The precise segmentation of the length of the film adds a lot to the film. The beginning of the chapter uses the most concise conflict paragraph to elicit the subsequent accusation, and then the director uses "good steel" on the "blade" of court battles. Excellent scheduling, Leiqie Actors such as El Weisz and Mo Niang brought extremely calm and restrained performances, which formed a wonderful contrast to the emotional release at the moment of winning the case. I feel sorry for Timothy Spall,...
Denial Comments
-
Janiya 2022-04-03 08:01:01
deny denial
Reminds me of the Nanjing Massacre, and Zhang Chunru. But the movie gave me another perspective, a legal trial between the plaintiff and the defendant. Indeed, for this case, it cannot be argued with historical survivors and a correct historical view. The legal trial has regulations and limits....
-
Kasey 2022-04-03 08:01:01
The truth is not afraid to prove
It's a biographical film, and I thought I'd swipe through it drowsily. But first of all, when the female professor Deborah mentioned that there is no historical photo or video to prove the "dts", I was intrigued. Then the "historian" who denied the "ncdts" incident also filed a defamation...
Top cast
-
Richard Rampton: The coward threatens only where he is safe.
[Quoting Goethe: "Der Feige droht nur, wo er sicher ist"]
-
Richard Rampton: My lord, during this trial, we have heard from Professor Evans and others of at least 25 major falsifications of history. Well, says Mr. Irving, "all historians make mistakes." But there is a difference between negligence, which is random in its effect, and a deliberateness, which is far more one-sided. All Mr. Irving's little fictions, all his tweaks of the evidence all tend in the same direction: the exculpation of Adolf Hitler. He is, to use an analogy, like the waiter who always gives the wrong change. If he is honest, we may expect sometimes his mistakes to favor the customers, sometimes himself. But Mr. Irving is the dishonest waiter. All his mistakes work in his favor. How far, if at all, Mr. Irving's Antisemitism is the cause of his Hitler apology, or vice versa, is unimportant. Whether they are taken together or individually, it is clear that they have led him to prostitute his reputation as a serious historian in favor of a bogus rehabilitation of Adolf Hitler and the dissemination of virulent Antisemitic propaganda.
