-
Oceane 2022-04-06 09:01:07
Those who deny historical facts are also presenting evidence for the root evil in their hearts and...
-
Brandt 2022-04-05 09:01:07
Irving's rebuttal is the same as a broken bed. You have solid evidence. You are free. I deceive...
-
Conrad 2022-04-05 09:01:07
I thought it would be complicated to understand, but I didn't expect it to be very simple and easy to understand, the calculation was accurate, and the rhythm was great. At first, the heroine was insulted and substituted into her emotions, from distrust to trust, and her emotional development was stable. Everyone represents a standpoint, whether it is rational, emotional, or popular prejudice, there is a very intense chemical conflict. The character selection is also great. One star less...
-
Hellen 2022-04-05 09:01:07
After the Japanese right-wing hotel denied the Nanjing Massacre, this was probably the one that touched my heart the most. It said a similar truth and a scene. Worth the...
-
Josiane 2022-04-05 09:01:07
Compared with the original, the adaptation is very...
-
Edwin 2022-04-05 09:01:07
I'm very interested in this kind of subject matter, but after watching it too much, I have to feel that the way of expression in this is too...
-
Mozelle 2022-04-05 09:01:07
It's normal, I can't stand...
-
Trycia 2022-04-05 09:01:07
I don't debate with anyone who denies it, and on the court, the best method to beat the opponent lie in the inconsistency among all stories told by...
-
Kamille 2022-04-05 09:01:07
There is a kind of story that is a discussion of opinions, a contest of intelligence, and a professional competence and strength. The second brush found that it is all about the heroine's emotionality to promote the narrative, but the stereotyped flattening of the heroine is not...
-
Beau 2022-04-05 09:01:07
The protagonist is actually a team of lawyers, and the heroine is forcibly given a sense of existence (. The angry man outside the court is the father of the late-night puppy Xianka in the West District... AS is too handsome plus one star (covering his...
Denial Comments
-
Richard Rampton: They're a strange thing consciences. Trouble is, what feels best isn't necessarily what works best.
-
David Irving: [first lines; in a video speaking to a sympathetic audience] I don't see any reason to be tasteful about Auschwitz. I say to you quite tastelessly that more women died on the back seat of Senator Edward Kennedy's car at Chappaquiddick than ever died in a gas chamber at Auschwitz.
[audience laughing and applauding]
Deborah Lipstadt: Holocaust denial rests on four basic assertions. Number 1: That there was never any systematic or organized attempt by the Nazis to kill all of Europe's Jews. Number 2: That the numbers are far fewer than five or six million. Number 3: That there were no gas chambers or specially built extermination facilities. Number 4: That the Holocaust is therefore a myth invented by Jews to get themselves financial compensation and to further the fortunes of the State of Israel. War, the deniers say, is a bloody business. There's nothing special about the Jews, they're not unique in their suffering. They're just everyday casualties of war. What's the fuss?
Deborah Lipstadt: Okay, and here's another question, how do we know the Holocaust happened? Seriously. I'm asking. How do we prove it? Photographic evidence? Not one person in this room or outside it has ever seen a photograph of a Jew inside a gas chamber. You know why? Because the Germans made sure that none were ever taken. So how do we know? How do we *know* that so many were murdered? So what's the proof? Where's the proof? How strong is it?
