-
Rosemary 2023-09-25 23:11:09
A self-reflection on American history and politics, Citizen Kane has been trying to fight the so-called "capitalist system" that hurt him since he was deprived of his right to love. Resistance in society becomes the result of the discipline of society itself. Kane actually replicated the violence he suffered, and the palace he built and his control over the showgirls undoubtedly proved that he was just another tyrant who called for freedom and anti-power, and his fatal tragedy was that the...
-
Beth 2023-09-08 14:12:15
K. Rosebud: not obtained, lost, sled: a turning point of fate, the counterattack of the intervened. The open multi-view structure and flashback processing, the ingenious combination of long shots and montages, the deep shots, and the spatial deformation of mirror images combine documentary and expressiveness. A monument to modern cinema. Self-directed and self-directed. Snow crystal...
-
Roselyn 2023-08-18 06:33:58
Roger Ebert's commentary tracks include but are not limited to: squatting is controlling, raising is obsession, left is a betrayal, right is a witness; double entry may be a general advance or a relationship comparison, over-the-shoulder close-ups are positive and negative emotional tension The focus is the most intense, followed by non-shoulders, and the few close-ups not only make it shocking and remembered once it appears, but also make the relationship between characters and the development...
-
Johnnie 2023-08-06 23:36:28
It breaks the traditional single-line narrative structure and causal chain, and uses non-linear and flashback narrative methods for "puzzle-style" characterization, which forms a subtle echo with Susan's "puzzle" in the castle in the second half. Furthermore, Eisenstein's "shock" montage is replaced by a large depth-of-field lens (depth lens) to achieve an ideographic effect, and when describing the current situation where Kane and his first wife's emotions are gradually fading away, he uses a...
-
Rodrigo 2023-07-06 03:11:08
[A+] The main reason for winning the "Best in Film History" is nothing more than perfecting all the elements in the film. Not to mention the depth-of-field shots that are highly praised by everyone, Ao Pang’s idea is far more than that: look at those amazing superimposed transitions, accompanied by the characters’ narration, the memory gradually wraps up the “reality”, and then in the Certain shadowy corners gradually fade out, and the only thing that can rival this technique is Apocalypse Now....
-
Rhett 2023-06-28 14:44:20
Objectively speaking, I must admit that this is really a great movie. The idea of shooting and the handling of the shots are very good, but subjectively speaking, I really don’t care too much╮(╯_╰)╭ , PS: Wei The domineering character of Les is very suitable for Kane's role, maybe, he is also playing...
-
Uriel 2023-06-19 16:12:30
I watched it twice in a row for the "God Movie". The first time I watched it as a suspense movie, and the second time I watched it as a biographical film. Generally speaking, the technical aspects such as the narrative structure, editing, photography, etc. are not backward even now, and can be called a god. But I really can only give three stars to the story itself, don't tell me that you can understand life after watching a movie, I only think what you can tell me in two...
-
Thurman 2023-06-13 19:47:22
Sure enough, it’s a classic. Although it’s common to watch the film’s shooting techniques and narrative structure more than 70 years later (these are very appropriate and classic in this film), but through six narratives, the film has created such a vivid and full image of Kane , and can arouse the audience's thinking, it is indeed a classic work. PS. Black and white film, don't watch it if you don't want to think about...
-
Darian 2023-05-10 20:21:24
I have never seen a film so impeccable in technique, style, content, depth, appeal, historical status, etc. before. Academics really shouldn't just explore/tout their formal art and put it on the shelf. //What is a rosebud? That is the unfortunate mark of deciding one's life's destiny because of childhood encounters. To be honest, this is too psychoanalytic! //Looking at Wells's life, his debut novel seems to echo his future destiny ingeniously - Kane's career was successful but his life was...
-
Elissa 2023-05-01 23:27:58
I am glued to this kind of movies. The more I watch the movies of the 1940s, the more...
Citizen Kane Comments
-
Davonte 2022-04-23 07:01:07
The greatest movie in the world, the eternal number one in my heart - "Citizen Kane"
[Analysis, Retention]
Richard Griffith disparaged the film as "tinpot if not crackpot Freud" in 1949's "The Movie So Far" ("If it's not a crackpot, it's just a tin pot", It means mediocre, if not lame).
Until Andre Bazin's review: The Evolution of Cinematic Language in the 1950s,...
-
Interviewer in 1935 Newsreel: Mr. Kane, how did you find business conditions in Europe?
Charles Foster Kane: How did I find business conditions in Europe? With great difficulty.
-
Charles Foster Kane: I run a couple of newspapers. What do you do?