-
Ada 2021-10-20 19:02:50
I didn't expect this film to be so blind, it took a long time to tell who is who. This is a very good subject, but a very bad film. Many plain dialogues, coupled with slow plots, even if the real scene is restored, should not be so expressive. This is a movie, not a documentary. To be too documentary requires some rendering of the plot such as music, but this film is just plain, and it is not enough to rely on the thrills of dangerous moments to attract...
-
Mallory 2021-10-20 19:02:50
The layout is quite large, and the atmosphere rendering is in place. The disadvantage is that the first half of the rhythm is too slow, and the rhythm is a bit...
-
Dennis 2021-10-20 19:02:50
The main theme of the United States is lengthy and...
-
Major 2021-10-20 19:02:50
It was actually the first Ron Howard to watch...the old and tacky American theme, basically a Hollywood space film template, but it's still pretty...but NASA is all white men, and women can only be in the film. The housewife behind her husband, looking at this from today's perspective, is worth thinking about. There should be no such movies in the United States. At the same time, only the United States has such a high level of film industry that can make this kind of commercial blockbuster...
-
Marcellus 2021-10-20 19:02:50
[Shanghai Film Festival Screening] Finally watched the 4K version on the giant screen. The effect is great. The adaptation of real events, coupled with the real weightlessness effect created by NASA's training flight aircraft, is very good. Although the whole film is full of aerospace terminology, it also greatly increases the sense of reality. In fact, the twists and turns of the event itself are enough to be exciting, disturbing, tense, and moving. The addition of dramatic bridges and...
-
Greyson 2021-10-20 19:02:50
#siff#Did you know, my plane failed, the electricity was gone, and it was pitch black. But if it weren’t for the power outage, I wouldn’t be able to see the green seaweed and I would not be able to go...
-
Herminia 2021-10-20 19:02:50
In the depression period when my blind date failed, I actually saw this kind of...
-
Lilliana 2021-10-20 19:02:50
①Although there is no evidence, I suspect that Jack at the beginning of the movie is driving. ②The space plan must be perfect, because even the smallest mistake will cause huge losses. ③Using the centrifugal force brought by the moon's gravity to throw the vehicle into the Earth-Moon return orbit, it sounds like Like God, the ground control personnel call the Odyssey over and over again, which greatly consumes people’s patience and accumulates people’s fear. The subsequent manned space program...
-
Rylan 2021-10-20 19:02:50
20190617@天山重看, I was impressed by the jelly at the beginning of the movie, and I couldn't help but want to go to the bathroom. The main theme is not to make people think that it is not easy to shoot well. The greatest and most successful failure, before the launch Fortunately, I got the best card in a bunch of bad cards. The smallness of people and the greatness of people coexist. Even in the face of difficulties and obstacles, the exploration journey will never stop. Many of the copied language
-
Libby 2021-10-20 19:02:50
I just watched it with...
Apollo 13 Comments
-
Lottie 2021-10-20 17:23:46
"American Theme Movie"?
Although there are many movies that have changed based on the truth, it is very rare for a film to advertise itself as a "documentary" like "Apollo 13". (After all, it is difficult to find a step-by-step rigor than space flight in this world, and there is never a lack of material for dramatic...
-
Loyal 2022-03-16 09:01:02
no surprises
Director Ron Howard can only be regarded as an outstanding craftsman. His films involve a wide range of subjects, such as science fiction, police and gangsters, western, fantasy and so on. It's too normal, no faults, no surprises, no surprises, and this "Apollo 13" is also the same. From his films,...
Apollo 13 quotes
-
Ken Mattingly: Okay, spacecraft control to computer.
John Aaron, EECOM Arthur: [seeing it go over budget on amperage] Damn!
Ken Mattingly: Damn. We overloaded. We used way too much power there. There must be a sneak circuit someplace between step seven and ten.
John Aaron, EECOM Arthur: All right, which one has the leak?
Ken Mattingly: Don't know that yet, John. The sequence was wrong. We just have to go back and try 'em one at a time.
John Young: [poking his head into the sim] You need a break, Ken?
Ken Mattingly: If they don't get one, I don't get one.
-
Grumman Rep: Gene, I want you to understand we've never tried this before: burn, cold soak, burn, cold soak, burn, manual control.
Gene Kranz: Look, it will ignite, will it not?
Grumman Rep: I just want you to know the engine's never been tried like this. That's all I'm trying to tell you.
Gene Kranz: Look, I know what you're trying to do. I guarantee you, I won't hold you personally responsible. If it lights, it lights. Let Lovell do the rest.