-
Gudrun 2023-09-05 10:00:43
Two and a half stars. I really don't know what to say other than weird. Playing Tom's mother is Maggie in growing...
-
Evangeline 2023-06-18 21:10:48
No matter what gender the other person is, it takes...
-
Guiseppe 2023-06-07 01:34:54
Smooth, no staring at the progress bar, no fast-forwarding, and even laughing several times. It's so lovely to receive the hand-made eli and hesitant to say anything! !...
-
Garnett 2023-06-03 16:12:33
How to say such a movie: It is a more realistic film. Not every love is nourished by the soil of happiness. Love, along with quarrels, never stops. The Chinese title translation is a bit...
-
Enid 2023-05-30 16:33:28
Some people just separated. I, who always believed in fate, suddenly didn't want to blame the problem on...
-
Grady 2023-05-04 01:09:28
Tom smiles so nicely, Eli so gentle. They are so cute, and finally can frankly face each other, which is very touching. Not particularly handsome, the feelings are very sincere and timid, I love you very much! Let me touch my face and laugh out...
-
Hadley 2023-04-08 18:01:22
I don't like this tone yet, there is no discrimination against gays or entanglement with sexual orientation, but focus on the emotional development between two...
-
Grant 2023-04-07 20:27:15
I give five stars, not because of how great the film is, but everyone will always have a few films, and they will turn it over from time to time to watch it again, using the simplest or resonating happiness or happiness to let You can also pretend to escape from reality. . . I have really watched this film no less than a dozen times. Although I have not yet had a stable relationship, and I am not afraid of falling in love, this film has always warmed my heart and I will look forward to...
-
Monica 2023-01-15 06:01:00
Regardless of men and women, the ups and downs in the emotional process, the entanglement of two people wanting to know each other's heart is the...
-
Katarina 2023-01-10 16:25:48
Forgive me if I'm weird. Because I love you without knowing...
All Over the Guy Comments
-
Tom: Jackie would love this bear... Fuzzy Wuzzy was a bear, Fuzzy Wuzzy had no hair, Fuzzy Wuzzy wasn't very fuzzy, was he? Was he? Was he? Was he? Was he?
Eli Wyckoff: [interrupting him] Was he, was he, WAS he!
Tom: That's what I said
Eli Wyckoff: No, no. You said "Was heeeee?" It's "WAS he"
Tom: What's the difference?
Eli Wyckoff: You're kidding, right? You just established that Fuzzy Wuzzy had no hair; why would you then ask "Was heeee?" like a question, like you didn't know if he was fuzzy or not?
Tom: It *is* a question, I'm asking if Fuzzy is or isn't fuzzy, what is so wrong about that?
Eli Wyckoff: It is a rhetorical question, it's supposed to be ironic! "Fuzzy Wuzzy wasn't very fuzzy... *was* he?"
-
Tom: Where you going?
Jackie: Uhh, home, to officially 'not call'.
Tom: No, no, no, no, you were supposed to stay here and watch Lifetime Television for Women and Gay Men!
Jackie: Uhh, no.
Tom: It's Joan Van Ark in "Not Without My Nose Job".
Jackie: Oh, angel, I've already lived that movie!
