2010: The Year We Make Contact Comments

Ezequiel 2023-09-02 16:35:29

It is nominally a sequel to "2001", but it is quite different in style from that classic, and has completely become a sci-fi film in the traditional sense. A very good note, the depiction of HAL is also more humanized. The background of the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union and the cooperation between the astronauts of the United States and the Soviet Union in the end also emphasize the background of the era of that era, with a clear anti-war...

Roderick 2022-11-14 20:45:35

The sequel to 2001: A Space Odyssey, continuing the setting of 2001, the difference is that the director is different. However, the fusion is very harmonious, and it also explains more about the settings of the previous work. It's just that from now on, it turns out that it's best not to make sequels to classic films, and they are made by different people. Successful sequels are really rare. I think it's good that the director made more extensions to the previous work. It would be nice if there...

Melyssa 2022-04-24 07:01:14

Compared with the previous work, it has more "human taste", and the plot is a lot richer, which is a supplement to 2001. But 2001 is a masterpiece after all, and this sequel cannot compare in terms of philosophical...

Briana 2022-04-24 07:01:14

The film itself is not bad. As a sequel to the classic "2001", it is short in comparison, and it is difficult to surpass the artistic achievements and ideological depth of its...

Owen 2022-04-24 07:01:14

I watched 2001 when I was a kid. Oh my god, what was that movie? It was dull and obscure. I remember my dad was always explaining it to me. I could understand a little bit, but this sequel is simple and clear. In the 1984 film, I read some comments and materials, and I answered a lot of questions. Don't say it's a continuation of the dog's tail. There must be arguments and foundations for nitpicking. At least it has completed its mission. The Queen's Russian is very...

Ashleigh 2022-04-24 07:01:14

It feels very cut. Cut out a lot of details. It's hard to understand if you haven't read the novel. Can't compare to 2001 at all. It can't be compared to the book at all. Because the whole film is just some scenes from the book that are abruptly moved out and pieced...

Bulah 2022-04-24 07:01:14

In the 1984 film, it is interesting to see their fantasies about the 21st century. For example, they think that at this time of ours, machines will have curiosity and can talk to people. Scientists who study machines should also be psychologists. People can keep pet dolphins at home. For another example, they believe that the Cold War will continue to escalate, and it will not end in the 21st century... Although the whole plot does not make any sense, the atmosphere is well...

John 2022-04-24 07:01:14

Clark once said that this is not 2001, it is another story. There are too many lines, and the shots are unimaginative, but the heavy breathing of the astronaut reminds me of 2001 again. And Dave, who waited so long, you fucking show me the TV screen and a few flashing shots! ! ! ! !...

Brooke 2022-04-24 07:01:14

There are too many lines, it's boring and bland, and there are many explanations for 2001, so let's find the original book and read...

Madonna 2022-04-24 07:01:14

Although the investment is not as good as the upper part, the story is clearer than that in 2001. People who have watched these two films probably think that interstellar travel is nothing,...