-
Elmira 2022-03-25 09:01:05
Sidney Lumet’s feature film debut. With the development of the plot, the focal length has gradually increased, and the telephoto lens has made the space more and more narrow. It seems that the walls behind you are constantly tightening the encircling circle of the characters; the first 1/3 of the lens is above the eye level, and the middle 1 /3 is the same as the human eye's line of sight, while the latter 1/3 is set at a height below eye level. The importance, dominance and enthusiasm of the...
-
Kevon 2022-03-25 09:01:05
My attitude is still neutral, but the ending of this discussion should not be a weighing point for evaluating this film. A ruling that does not involve private pros and cons is also a kind of impeccable justice. The pattern of the film and the system of performance can make China feel uncomfortable. The actors used simple language, demeanor and even sweat to create an unparalleled sense of presence ("This Man Comes From Earth" is not magical at...
-
Merl 2022-03-25 09:01:05
The jury in the secret...
-
Donnell 2022-03-25 09:01:05
Great scheduling, perfect script, another possible interpretation of confined...
-
Ena 2022-03-25 09:01:05
Too wonderful single-scene movie, one is the script, and the other is the interpretation. A person's unintentional persistence changed a world. Top ten of the...
-
Trace 2022-03-24 09:01:10
Prejudice always obscures the...
-
Ida 2022-03-24 09:01:10
The American jury system has realized the coexistence of democracy and elites to a certain extent. It is based on a very Kantian foundation, that is, human beings are rational, so they can be enlightened and judged based on facts. But this example is not suitable for promotion, because the objective decision of the jury is the interests of others, while in public affairs it is the decision of conflicts of interest. In any case, the first-class movie, the plot tension...
-
Ansley 2022-03-24 09:01:10
This is the end of the...
-
Grayson 2022-03-24 09:01:10
"Recommended"——This is hand-made, not the system default. can not...
-
Elinore 2022-03-24 09:01:10
Very vivid group play, 12 people are highly personalized, many details echoed in the distance, flexible scheduling in a confined space, extremely sharp lines, court debates and personal privacy intersection, the rhythm of climax and relative decline is masterful, watching such a movie is really good...
12 Angry Men Comments
-
Roger 2021-10-19 09:48:20
Old and strong, we are too late to meet
Where can I see old movies better? Faced with this question, my previous answer was that it is better to see West Lake at best. The so-called fierce "Rashomon", the so-called gorgeous "Gone with the Wind", and the so-called classic "Budget of North Africa" all did not make me sneeze. As long as...
-
Denis 2022-04-19 09:01:11
A brief analysis of secondary driving factors other than "facts" in group decision-making
The film completes the vivid portrayal of characters from different backgrounds and social classes in a closed scene of about 1.5 hours, leaving aside the connection between the characters' performance and experience, logical reasoning, and the human nature of "suspecting guilt never knowing"....
-
Juror #8: It's always difficult to keep personal prejudice out of a thing like this. And wherever you run into it, prejudice always obscures the truth. I don't really know what the truth is. I don't suppose anybody will ever really know. Nine of us now seem to feel that the defendant is innocent, but we're just gambling on probabilities - we may be wrong. We may be trying to let a guilty man go free, I don't know. Nobody really can. But we have a reasonable doubt, and that's something that's very valuable in our system. No jury can declare a man guilty unless it's sure.
-
[last lines]
Juror #9: Hey!... What's your name?
Juror #8: Davis.
Juror #9: [shakes his hand] My name's McCardle.
[pause]
Juror #9: Well, so long.
Juror #8: So long.
