12 Angry Men Comments

Alisha 2022-04-24 07:01:02

The script is great, the director's skills are very deep, and the actors' acting skills are all online, which is very...

Sasha 2022-04-24 07:01:02

(9/10) Great one scene. (There have been many versions of this film, including: 1954 original version (50 minutes), 1957 classic version, 1991 Japanese version, 1997 color version, 2007 Russian version, 2014 Chinese version. The 57 version is the...

Julien 2022-04-24 07:01:02

Follow the clip book to replay the film again. Although it is an indoor scene, the camera is really exquisite. The jury took on the roles of prosecutors and lawyers to restructure the case. Because they are the last hurdle of procedural justice, the questioning of evidence and testimony leads to debates between conscience and morality, prejudice and justice, and between individuals and society. The audience is also persuaded step by step, and the plot is set extremely...

Frank 2022-04-24 07:01:02

9.9 points, a few years after Hitchcock's "Reaper of Souls", and missed the pioneer status of the small room genre. This is not a reasoning film, but a reflection on the fairness and justice of democracy, law, and some people's livelihood feelings by the way. The plot arrangement is not as hypocritical as my country's "Twelve Citizens" / the English guilty pronunciation seems to be guilty of...

Clotilde 2022-04-24 07:01:02

[A+] An extremely powerful masterpiece, from the director's script to the actors are impeccable. It is difficult for a small pattern to create conflict itself, so most of the same themes choose to borrow location; and except for the three scenes at the beginning and the end of the film, there is no location in the whole film, and it all takes place in a small room, but it creates such a strong dramatic conflict. is a miracle. The whole film is very coherent, coherent, fast-paced, but also knows...

Candace 2022-04-24 07:01:02

What attracted me the most was not the introduction of the concept of "democracy" in the film, but the way people communicated throughout the discussion. In the end what kind of performance can be said to be "paranoid"? It may not be appropriate to accuse the other party of being paranoid in an argument, right? Paranoia should be stubbornness under the premise of "prejudice", while unbiased clinging to one's own point of view should be said to be...

Jensen 2022-04-24 07:01:02

The reason to doubt in the most seemed convinced situation is...

Mossie 2022-04-24 07:01:02

A complete psychology teaching film, I watched it in 2009, and watched it more than once, it was...

Elouise 2022-04-24 07:01:02

❶ Innocence is not the point, nor is it a necessary result, the emphasis is on "reasonable doubt". As No. 9 said: "This gentleman has been fighting against us all by himself. He didn't say the kid was innocent, he just couldn't be sure. It's not easy to fight someone's taunting alone, so he took a gamble and got support, I Supported him, and I respect his motives. The kid on trial may be guilty, but I want to hear more.” ❷ Lazy judges, sultry weather, jurors with distinct personalities,...

Forrest 2022-04-24 07:01:02

This is a remarkable thing of democracy that we are notified by mail to come down to this place to decide on a guilt or innocence of a man we have never heard of before. We have nothing to gain or lose by our verdict. This is one of the reasons why we are...