Sally Kinghorn

Rowland 2021-10-13 13:07:34

The most prominent symbol of the film is the "horseless" knight who uses coconut shells instead of riding a horse. As a low-cost film, it is extremely spoof, the value curve is like a nail, and it is a model of low-cost production. There are many scenes and a fast pace. Each scene has a...

Dariana 2021-10-13 13:06:27

    When I looked at it, I didn't know it was in 1975, and I couldn't tell. Never heard of Monty Python. Watching this movie in a relaxed mood, that is, without any emotion.
    From the beginning, I said that I had fired the person who made the wrong subtitles. I thought it was purely...

Faustino 2022-04-23 07:01:01

Who says the British are rigid? But I don't think this film is the ancestor of the nonsensical, and its source should be the neuro-comedy that prevailed in Hollywood in the 1940s and 1950s

Friedrich 2021-10-20 18:59:32

Maybe I read the works of King Arthur, Narnia, and Scott too early, and now I am not interested in medieval themes such as the Lord of the Rings or even Harry Potter. Even the spoof version is the same. Although there are a lot of laughs in this film, it just can't be laughed freely. Is this a cultural barrier?