Reed Howes

Alana 2021-12-30 17:21:44

After watching this movie, I know why such a classic old movie is so little known in China.
Because the questions raised in the film are worthy of reflection for everyone: who should be responsible for the war, and in what name should the people of the defeated country be judged.

First of all, the...

Adolfo 2021-12-30 17:21:44

First, a person's behavior is in accordance with the national interest and the law, but the behavior has caused evil results. Should this person be responsible for the evil results? Second, should the professional ethics of judges be loyal to the law? Or should it be judged above the law? If...

Deja 2022-04-23 07:02:33

8. Whose fault is the Nazi atrocities?

Rosario 2022-04-22 07:01:32

2021.3.10 Rewatch. Compared with the previous Smith and Angry Man, the objects discussed in this film are more complex, and the standards and pressures for reference are also greater. The other biggest difference is that it weakens the symbolic indication of individuals, and then emphasizes and expands the group crime speculation that the law is not responsible for the public as a sample. Both the upper and lower sides of the bench are the spokespersons of legal authority. However, under the suggestion of the collective will, both the prosecution, defense and the referee have been affected by what can not be described as fairness and justice. The trial of the century is so contentious and uncontroversial that it is even more interesting to place it in the current context. The film is too long, the performance is slightly exaggerated, and the subtitles are not ideal.