Paul Darren Varricchio

George 2022-03-21 09:02:01

I'm not in finance, so although I thought it was like this with banks, I didn't know if it was nonsense. Anyway, I was very engaged in watching it. What's
more exciting is the scenery in many places, including the fact that I've always been curious about whether it's true or not. I went to the...

Edwardo 2022-01-27 08:08:03

Interna Schoner, turned into a multinational bank—a multinational organization that happens to be the enemy of the proletarian Comintern...but in this film, both seem to be opposites.

There's something good about this movie, and a scene at the Guggenheim Museum is really impressive. The footage of...

Missouri 2022-03-24 09:01:59

As long as the director goes to Hollywood, what he shoots is almost the same. The scene on the roof at the end of this film is almost 007, and the gun that resists the male protagonist is from Infernal Affairs.

Guillermo 2022-03-20 09:01:51

Except that the killers got together and punched the entire Guggenheim Museum with bullet holes. The whole film is basically nonsense. I understand very well that Tom Tykaway doesn't want people to think he's making a mindless popcorn action movie, when he wants to pursue some international political games, and he wants to make a personal confrontation with institutions. That powerless and pathetic sense of fate, I also admit that some lines are stronger (-"sometimes the more you avoid your ideals, the closer you get to your destiny"), but these can't hide the loopholes of the blunt plot and the weakness of the climax moments . One more thing to say, after watching this film, China is obviously going to be unhappy again. Are all the arms of the third world in the world bought from China?