-
Priscilla 2022-01-14 08:01:34
Vintage.
The remake of this film is from Gambit in 1966.
So from the script to the shooting, the effect is very retro.
But I have to say something because the sense of the times is too strong.
This kind of movie forced to move to today's society is indeed somewhat unsatisfactory.
In fact, I'm still looking... -
Leanne 2022-01-14 08:01:34
No thief, no thief
It may also be a problem with the translation of Chinese film titles, which is misleading. Thieves and pornographic thieves are always reminiscent of typical Hollywood thief films, such as "Eleven Arhats" and "Twelve Arhats", which are thrilling to the viewers. But after reading it, I totally feel...
Masashi Fujimoto
-
Allan 2022-03-25 09:01:18
Cameron's arrogance is not worth mentioning. What he likes to watch is Uncle Ke's cute and funny and Allen's betrayal. As for the story, it's all clouds. The black frame is handsome and explosive!
-
Ashleigh 2022-01-14 08:01:34
Once again trapped by the professor's talk, and still indifferent to Colin, Diaz's role modeling is contrived. The boring plot and the details that can't be laughed at all are to delay the time for the unsurprising reversal. The whole movie has no bright spots and no selling points. The topic of the thief is just howling.
Related articles
-
Harry Deane: I see the painting. A reproduction though, sir, in my opinion.
Lionel Shabandar: Bloody hell, based on what?
Harry Deane: Based on the fact that it's hanging on a wall of a caravan, sir. In Texas.
-
Lionel Shabandar: You may not realize it, Miss Puznowski, but Harry Deane knows Monet like I know... actually, I don't know anything quite like that.
