Lilia Skala

Beth 2022-02-22 08:02:00

True love is letting go. After watching this film, I became stupid too, I was not high originally.
Charlie, from a mentally retarded, to a genius, and finally turned into a story about mentally retarded. Before he was about to become mentally retarded again, his lingering shadow of the past loomed...

Cameron 2022-02-22 08:02:00

"If the plural of mouse is mice, the plural of spouse must be spice." a wisecrack from our protagonist Charly Gordon (Robertson), trying to convince viewers that it is something a genius would jest with his girlfriend, both sun-drenched, lying on a cozy meadow. But this is not the Charly we know in...

Sadye 2022-04-24 07:01:23

Talking about the difference between this film and the novel, the original novel can be said to be a masterpiece of psychology bible level. Although this film does not reach that level, it still shows a reconstruction of the essence of the original in many aspects, such as borrowing Charlie's mouth's examination and irony of the current society. In addition, the important female characters in the novel, Fei, and Charlie's parents and sisters, did not appear in the film, which is really a pity.

Donato 2022-04-21 09:03:16

Charlie's psychological changes and self-exploration in the original book are all related to his childhood experiences with his parents. It can be said that the entire novel is built on this, but the film completely discards this part of the exploration, and abruptly adapts the exquisite psychoanalysis work into vulgarity. The love story is so disappointing. Actor Charlie's performance is also very general, basically pretending to be crazy and stupid, and Charlie's changes in the original book are not shown.