-
Priscilla 2022-01-14 08:01:34
Vintage.
The remake of this film is from Gambit in 1966.
So from the script to the shooting, the effect is very retro.
But I have to say something because the sense of the times is too strong.
This kind of movie forced to move to today's society is indeed somewhat unsatisfactory.
In fact, I'm still looking... -
Leanne 2022-01-14 08:01:34
No thief, no thief
It may also be a problem with the translation of Chinese film titles, which is misleading. Thieves and pornographic thieves are always reminiscent of typical Hollywood thief films, such as "Eleven Arhats" and "Twelve Arhats", which are thrilling to the viewers. But after reading it, I totally feel...
Katie Goldfinch
-
Freddy 2022-03-26 09:01:11
Cohen's script is really not too bad, although there is no spark between the actors, and the director's control is a little weaker. But it is this strange feeling that is put together, and the cold and humorous effect also reflects the style that is different from the previous type of comedy. Uncle Colin's cute route is quite effective, but Diaz is not happy with the vase this time. The point is that she is really old.
-
Kiley 2022-03-28 09:01:08
It's more relaxed and happy. Uncle Colin seems to be abused by the professor, but the two of them are cute together. The script itself has nothing to do with it, and so is the movie.
Related articles
-
The Major: Perhaps, sir, since out little caper is far from over, perhaps we should consider removing the cartilage.
Harry Deane: Don't be an ass, man. I'm hardly likely to be hit in the face a third time.
The Major: Uh, that *was* the third time, sir.
Harry Deane: This isn't a maths class!
-
[last lines]
Harry Deane: Fancy trying your hand at Picasso?
The Major: Do you think we'd find a use for it?
Harry Deane: Seems Donald Trump is obsessed with the fellow. And there's many a billionaire in Texas.
The Major: Mr. Deane.
Harry Deane: Oh, yes, Major, the opportunities are endless.
