-
Westley 2022-03-02 08:01:08
a depressing comedy
I find it hard for me to rate this movie. To be fair it probably deserves four stars, good script, good actors, good interest and depth.
But...I really think...well, Eli, you deserve better. Watching this movie made me understand what it means to be depressed and what it means to vomit blood:... -
Barbara 2022-03-02 08:01:08
Noisy and then...
The noise here only refers to couples.
Not talking about living together, just getting along, and there may be friction between lovers. I think Gone with the Wind has to watch it, but you have never seen it, let alone not watch it. Well, it's very likely that there will be a quarrel. Standing in...
Julie Davis
-
Milo 2022-03-02 08:01:08
The actors are cute, but the director ruined the film~ Too bland
-
Adonis 2022-03-19 09:01:10
When the boy and the boy were about to be together, I turned off the movie. Does it mean that as a gay, you should endure this kind of shit love movie? Forget it, I'd better watch gay porn.
Related articles
-
Tom: Jackie would love this bear... Fuzzy Wuzzy was a bear, Fuzzy Wuzzy had no hair, Fuzzy Wuzzy wasn't very fuzzy, was he? Was he? Was he? Was he? Was he?
Eli Wyckoff: [interrupting him] Was he, was he, WAS he!
Tom: That's what I said
Eli Wyckoff: No, no. You said "Was heeeee?" It's "WAS he"
Tom: What's the difference?
Eli Wyckoff: You're kidding, right? You just established that Fuzzy Wuzzy had no hair; why would you then ask "Was heeee?" like a question, like you didn't know if he was fuzzy or not?
Tom: It *is* a question, I'm asking if Fuzzy is or isn't fuzzy, what is so wrong about that?
Eli Wyckoff: It is a rhetorical question, it's supposed to be ironic! "Fuzzy Wuzzy wasn't very fuzzy... *was* he?"
-
Tom: Where you going?
Jackie: Uhh, home, to officially 'not call'.
Tom: No, no, no, no, you were supposed to stay here and watch Lifetime Television for Women and Gay Men!
Jackie: Uhh, no.
Tom: It's Joan Van Ark in "Not Without My Nose Job".
Jackie: Oh, angel, I've already lived that movie!
