James Adamson

Deshawn 2021-12-09 08:01:20

The story of Beauty and the Beast is sold every thirty years. Indeed, the vitality of movies that stand out when the world is bad is strong.

On the surface, this is an abusive Hollywood theme-the 1976 version of "King Kong" reflects this very well-but boldly imaginative scripts and the use of...

Antonette 2021-12-09 08:01:20

I still don’t know how many special effects were made by the film crew at that time. It was indeed a visual feast to be able to watch such a film in 1933. The American market economy system regarded movies as commodities, but it was not a taste. Not advisable, because countless Hollywood filmmakers...

Anderson 2021-12-09 08:01:20

The genre narrative is very skillful, and the visual map of primitive wildness and industrial civilization is presented in opposition, which is quite warning of the dramatic expansion of industrial civilization, but it is a breakthrough in industrial production to have such proficiency in special effects in the 1930s. On the other hand, Peter Jackson's version of "King Kong", apart from the special effects (hardware facilities) and the emotional impact of "human and animal love" on this basis, there is almost no major rewriting. The old version is still strong.

Olin 2022-03-20 09:01:44

The three versions (three versions) of King Kong have been read, and the storyline framework of the 2005 version is basically the same as this 33-year version. I remember that the storyline of the 76th edition that I watched a long time ago was a bit innovative.