-
Antonette 2021-12-09 08:01:20
King Kong
I still don’t know how many special effects were made by the film crew at that time. It was indeed a visual feast to be able to watch such a film in 1933. The American market economy system regarded movies as commodities, but it was not a taste. Not advisable, because countless Hollywood filmmakers...
-
Imelda 2021-12-09 08:01:20
Cultural Context &Subtext Narrative
Please poke the original address: http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_764ecb420100q5wi.html
"World of Science Fiction" 2006 03 Issue Classic Sci-Fi Interpretation (10): The white shadow of the black "King Kong"
plus some notes of my own. Please ignore the paragraphs in "()".
The 1933 horror/disaster...
Jack Smith
-
Dayne 2021-12-09 08:01:20
In terms of special effects, I actually don't think it looks good in my current eyes, but it should be very good at that time, and the settings of the beasts and beauties are also very good. The 05 version is completely shot in accordance with the old version. In this regard, the old version has its own glory~
-
Kirsten 2022-03-26 09:01:05
Not bad, it's better than the 05 version, Ultraman's fight against little monsters must be the inspiration here, and the heroine's skirt is also torn very stylish, roar, see the Empire State Building again, "It was the beauty who killed the beast. "The director's remarks have deep meaning
Related articles
-
Carl Denham: [protesting the agent's lack of confidence in the safety of Denham's voyage] You act as if I've never brought anybody back alive! Look at the Captain and first mate - - they've gone on several of my last missions, and they don't look any the worse for wear.
Jack Driscoll: [sarcastically, in wary half-hearted agreement with Denham's assertions] Yeah - - we're healthy!
-
Theatre Patron: Say, what's Denham got, anyway?
Another theatre patron: [in doubtful pre-disgust] Well, it better be good after all this ballyhoo!
