-
Mae 2022-03-27 08:01:01
If you don't understand music, it will be difficult to see the taste.
String Quartet is my favorite. Symphony, too many people, too noisy, so I like chamber music. The chamber music piano ensemble is too heavy, the brass is too transparent, or the string quartet, the most common form of chamber music, is the most acceptable to me. It is said that connoisseurs comment...
-
Rhoda 2022-03-27 08:01:01
alex and nina
Fugue Quartet. There are four musical scores and four seats on the stage. Four pianos, four people. Clear, orderly, harmonious one.
Under the stage is a pot of porridge.
The cello is the elder and mentor of the entire fugue ensemble. He found out that he had Parkinson's disease on the third...
Imogen Poots
Performing Experience
Character Evaluation
-
Arch 2022-03-27 09:01:23
Music conveys emotion, and music without emotion is also affected. The curtain call at the end is quite sad, the middle is old and messy
-
Noah 2022-03-27 09:01:23
The four veteran actors co-starred in a film about middle-aged or old-age crisis. They chose the right cast to play a suitable story, and established the quality of the film. The externalized dramatic conflict and restrained narrative techniques, coupled with the wonderful soundtrack, A masterpiece. The film shows the troubles of the four old partners, such as health, career, love, and ideals. Life itself is trouble, but how can it be called life without trouble?
Related articles
-
Juliette Gelbart: Why are you so angry with me? What did I do to cause you to talk to me in this way? I mean, did we just spoil you too much? Is that what it is?
Alexandra Gelbart: Do you think I had fun? Do you think it was fun growing up with two roving quartet players as parents? Who were gone 7 months of the year and I was always taking a back seat to a violin and a viola? Always. Is that fun? Does that seem fun to you?
Juliette Gelbart: You have always been our first priority.
Alexandra Gelbart: That is bullshit! That's bullshit, that's just words. That's nothing.
-
[first lines]
Peter Mitchell: Time present and time past are both perhaps present in time future, and time future contained in time past. If all time is eternally present, all time is unredeemable. Or say that the end precedes the beginning, and the end and the beginning were always there before the beginning and after the end. And all is always now.
